Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC)

被引:291
作者
Frings, Christian [1 ]
Hommel, Bernhard [2 ]
Koch, Iring [3 ]
Rothermund, Klaus [4 ]
Dignath, David [5 ]
Giesen, Carina [4 ]
Kiesel, Andrea [5 ]
Kunde, Wilfried [6 ]
Mayr, Susanne [7 ]
Moeller, Birte [1 ]
Moeller, Malte [7 ]
Pfister, Roland [6 ]
Philipp, Andrea [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trier, Dept Cognit Psychol, Trier, Germany
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Gen Psychol, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Aachen, Dept Cognit & Expt Psychol, Aachen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Dept Gen Psychol 2, Jena, Germany
[5] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychol, Freiburg, Germany
[6] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Cognit Psychol, Wurzburg, Germany
[7] Univ Passau, Dept Psychol & Human Machine Interact, Passau, Germany
关键词
STIMULUS-RESPONSE ASSOCIATIONS; EPISODIC RETRIEVAL; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; EVENT FILES; TASK; INTEGRATION; PERCEPTION; CLASSIFICATION; INHIBITION; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Human action control relies on representations that integrate perception and action, but the relevant research is scattered over various experimental paradigms and the theorizing is overly paradigm-specific. To overcome this obstacle we propose BRAC (binding and retrieval in action control), an overarching, integrative framework that accounts for a wide range of seemingly unrelated findings by assuming 'two core processes: feature binding and retrieval'. In contrast to previous approaches, we define binding and retrieval as functionally different and separable processes that independently contribute to the observed effects. Furthermore, both processes are independently modulated by top-down and/or bottom-up processes. BRAC organizes the literature on action control in novel ways, and relates diverse independently investigated action-related phenomena from different research fields to each other.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 387
页数:13
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]   Testing Probability Matching and Episodic Retrieval Accounts of Response Repetition Effects in Task Switching [J].
Altmann, Erik M. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (04) :935-951
[2]   ACT-R: A theory of higher level cognition and its relation to visual attention [J].
Anderson, JR ;
Matessa, M ;
Lebiere, C .
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 1997, 12 (04) :439-462
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ATTENTION SPACE ACTI
[4]  
[Anonymous], PLOS ONE
[5]   Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects [J].
Ansorge, Ulrich ;
Gozli, Davood G. ;
Goller, Florian .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2019, 83 (06) :1251-1268
[6]   Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy [J].
Awh, Edward ;
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) :437-443
[7]   A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis [J].
Badets, Arnaud ;
Koch, Iring ;
Philipp, Andrea M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2016, 80 (01) :1-15
[8]   Dissecting components of reward: 'liking', 'wanting', and learning [J].
Berridge, Kent C. ;
Robinson, Terry E. ;
Aldridge, J. Wayne .
CURRENT OPINION IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 9 (01) :65-73
[9]   Doing Is for Feeling [J].
Blask, Katarina ;
Frings, Christian ;
Walther, Eva .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2016, 145 (10) :1263-1268
[10]   Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction [J].
Bouton, ME .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 52 (10) :976-986