Different Designs of Proximal Femoral Stems for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mid-Term Clinical and Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes

被引:7
作者
Katakam, Akhil [1 ]
Hosseinzadeh, Shayan [1 ]
Humphrey, Tyler J. [1 ]
Collins, Austin [1 ]
Shin, David [1 ]
Melnic, Christopher M. [1 ]
Bragdon, Charles [1 ]
Bedair, Hany S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Orthopaed, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
promis; hoos; femoral stem design; total hip arthroplasty (tha); patient reported outcome measures; REVISION HIP; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.19745
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: A comprehensive comparison of the performance of different femoral stem geometries in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is yet to be described. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate objective and subjective outcome measures in primary THA with different femoral implant styles. Methods: Stems were classified into the following five classes: cemented, conical, fit and fill, modular, and wedge. The objective outcomes of interest were the length of inpatient hospital stay (LOS), 90-day readmission rate, one-year revision rate, and two-year mortality rate. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS), including hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) - physical function shortform (HOOS-PS), patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function short form 10a (PROMIS PF-10a), and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system - short form - mental 10a (PROMIS M-10a) were recorded and compared between different classes. Results: Patients with a wedge stem had a significantly lower LOS versus every other stem group, while patients with a cemented stem had the highest LOS, approximately twofold that of the wedge stem group. Accounting for potential confounders, the conical and fit and fill groups had a significantly higher two-year mortality rate than the wedge stem group. Fit and fill stems conferred a slight risk of revision THA at one-year compared to wedge stems. There was no significant difference in the rates of failure to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the PROMS. Conclusion: Placement of wedge stems resulted in a significantly lower LOS compared to every other stem class and a lower mortality rate than the conical, fit and fill, and modular stems. As for the 90-day readmission, one-year revision, and the rates of failure to achieve the MCID for general or hip-specific PROMS, stem design had no meaningful effect.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Fully Porous 3D Printed Titanium Femoral Stem to Reduce Stress-Shielding Following Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Arabnejad, Sajad ;
Johnston, Burnett ;
Tanzer, Michael ;
Pasini, Damiano .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (08) :1774-1783
[2]   Early Mortality after Modern Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Aynardi, Michael ;
Pulido, Luis ;
Parvizi, Javad ;
Sharkey, Peter F. ;
Rothman, Richard H. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (01) :213-218
[3]  
Barad Steven J, 2018, Arthroplast Today, V4, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.artd.2015.08.003
[4]   The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States [J].
Bozic, Kevin J. ;
Kurtz, Steven M. ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Vail, Thomas P. ;
Berry, Daniel J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (01) :128-133
[5]   Establishing maximum medical improvement following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff deficiency [J].
Cabarcas, Brandon C. ;
Gowd, Anirudh K. ;
Liu, Joseph N. ;
Cvetanovich, Gregory L. ;
Erickson, Brandon J. ;
Romeo, Anthony A. ;
Verma, Nikhil N. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (09) :1721-1731
[6]  
Canfield Michael, 2020, Arthroplast Today, V6, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.artd.2019.10.003
[7]   More complications with uncemented than cemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 69 patients [J].
Chammout, Ghazi ;
Muren, Olle ;
Laurencikas, Evaldas ;
Boden, Henrik ;
Kelly-Pettersson, Paula ;
Sjoo, Helene ;
Stark, Andre ;
Skoldenberg, Olof .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2017, 88 (02) :145-151
[8]   Comparison of anatomic vs. straight femoral stem design in total hip replacement - femoral canal fill in vivo [J].
de Boer, Friso A. ;
Sariali, Elhadi .
HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 27 (03) :241-244
[9]  
Franovic S., 2020, SEMIN ARTHROPLASTY, V30, P154, DOI [10.1053/j.sart.2020.05.008, DOI 10.1053/J.SART.2020.05.008]
[10]   Longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcome measures following total hip arthroplasty and predictors of deterioration during follow-up A SEVEN-YEAR PROSPECTIVE INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTRE STUDY [J].
Galea, V. P. ;
Roianasopondist, P. ;
Ingelsrud, L. H. ;
Rubash, H. E. ;
Bragdon, C. ;
Huddleston, J. I., III ;
Malchau, H. ;
Troelsen, A. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2019, 101B (07) :768-778