Active flow control of low-pressure turbine separation

被引:0
作者
Balzer, W. [1 ]
Gross, A. [1 ]
Fasel, H. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE HPCMP USERS GROUP CONFERENCE 2007 | 2007年
关键词
DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; VORTEX-GENERATOR JETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Operating low-pressure turbines (LPT) at off-design conditions or considering more aggressive designs can lead to laminar separation on the suction side of the LPT blades resulting in significant turbine and overall engine performance losses. In these instances, performance improvements may be achieved with active flow control (AFC). In an extensive experimental research program at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) at Wright-Patterson AFB, Dr. R.B. Rivir and co-workers systematically investigated the benefits of AFC with steady and pulsed vortex generator jets (VGJs) for a linear PakB LPT cascade. Pulsed VGJs were found to be very effective in mitigating separation. We are employing two in-house computational fluid dynamics (CFD) research codes for investigating the physical mechanisms associated with AFC for LPT geometries. For simulations of the entire LPT blade, a high-order-accurate finite volume code based on the compressible Navier-Stokes equations is used Data from direct numerical simulations (DNS) with up to 19.4 million grid points of a PakB blade at Re=25,000 are compared with experimental data. For our fully resolved DNS that focus exclusively on the separated flow region, we are employing a high-order-accurate compact finite difference code based on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in vorticity-velocity formulation. Here, we study a separation bubble on a flat plate and on a curved wall model-geometry under LPT conditions. These simulations enable us to identify the intricate physical mechanisms associated with unsteady separation, transition, flow instabilities, and active control using VGJs. In particular, our simulation results provide an explanation for the stunning effectiveness of pulsed VGJs for separation control.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 20040751 AIAA
[2]   Turbulence mechanism in Klebanoff transition: A quantitative comparison of experiment and direct numerical simulation [J].
Bake, S ;
Meyer, DGW ;
Rist, U .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2002, 459 (459) :217-243
[3]   The fluid dynamics of LPT blade separation control using pulsed jets [J].
Bons, JP ;
Sondergaard, R ;
Rivir, RB .
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2002, 124 (01) :77-85
[4]  
BONS JP, 2001, T ASME 198, V123
[5]  
BONS PB, 2000, P TURBOEXPO 2000 MUN
[6]   Characteristic ghost-cell boundary condition [J].
Gross, A. ;
Fasel, H. F. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2007, 45 (01) :302-306
[7]   Numerical investigation of low-pressure turbine blade separation control [J].
Gross, A ;
Fasel, HF .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2005, 43 (12) :2514-2525
[8]   Flow measurements of vortex generator jets in separating boundary layer [J].
Hansen, L. ;
Bons, J. .
JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2006, 22 (03) :558-566
[9]  
Huang J., 2003, 20031027 AIAA
[10]  
Hunt J.C., 1988, 19890015184 STANF U