Beyond benefits: Towards a recreational ecosystem services interpretive framework

被引:14
作者
Rice, William L. [1 ,2 ]
Newman, Peter [1 ]
Taff, B. Derrick [1 ]
Zipp, Katherine Y. [3 ]
Miller, Zachary D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Recreat Pk & Tourism Management, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Univ Montana, Dept Soc & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ Sociol & Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Utah State Univ, Dept Environm & Soc, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
Recreational ecosystem services; cultural ecosystem services; benefits approach to leisure; outcomes focused management; protected area management; TRADE-OFFS; NATIONAL-PARK; PROTECTED AREAS; VISITORS; EXPERIENCE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; SATISFACTION; INFORMATION; LANDSCAPES;
D O I
10.1080/01426397.2020.1777956
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The challenge of managing protected areas to purvey benefits through visitor experiences has been a major subject of research within the fields of recreation and leisure. Driver and others have advocated for the benefits approach to leisure with relative success. However, this largely-social approach discounts the role of the setting in purveying benefits and the tradeoffs managers must make between ecological and visitor wellbeing. In an emerging body of literature, use-values inherent to recreation are often referred to as recreational ecosystem services. In this approach, recreational outcomes are analysed in the context of the ecological processes through which they are provisioned. It is theorised that a union between the management concepts of recreational ecosystem services and the benefits approach to leisure has the potential to improve the management of protected areas. This manuscript introduces the Recreational Ecosystem Services Interpretive Framework through a review of the existing theory and literature on both approaches to protected area management.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 904
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
[51]   Understanding relationships among recreation opportunities: A meta-analysis of nine studies [J].
Pierskalla, CD ;
Lee, ME ;
Stein, TV ;
Anderson, DH ;
Nickerson, R .
LEISURE SCIENCES, 2004, 26 (02) :163-180
[52]  
Pietilä M, 2017, VISIT STUD, V20, P187, DOI 10.1080/10645578.2017.1404350
[53]   Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level [J].
Plieninger, Tobias ;
Dijks, Sebastian ;
Oteros-Rozas, Elisa ;
Bieling, Claudia .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 33 :118-129
[54]   Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services [J].
Polizzi, Cecilia ;
Simonetto, Matteo ;
Barausse, Alberto ;
Chaniotou, Ninetta ;
Kankanen, Riina ;
Keranen, Silja ;
Manzardo, Alessandro ;
Mustajarvi, Kaisa ;
Palmeri, Luca ;
Scipioni, Antonio .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 14 :158-169
[55]  
Potschin M., 2016, Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, V1, P25, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315775302, DOI 10.4324/9781315775302-4]
[56]   Ecosystem services: Exploring a geographical perspective [J].
Potschin, Marion B. ;
Haines-Young, Roy H. .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 35 (05) :575-594
[57]   Participative mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Pedra Branca State Park, Brazil [J].
Ribeiro, Fernando P. ;
Ribeiro, Katia T. .
NATUREZA & CONSERVACAO, 2016, 14 (02) :120-127
[58]   Connecting motivations to outcomes: A study of park visitors' outcome attainment [J].
Rice, William L. ;
Taff, B. Derrick ;
Miller, Zachary D. ;
Newman, Peter ;
Zipp, Katherine Y. ;
Pan, Bing ;
Newton, Jennifer N. ;
D'Antonio, Ashley .
JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM-RESEARCH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 29
[59]   The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services [J].
Ridding, Lucy E. ;
Redhead, John W. ;
Oliver, Tom H. ;
Schmucki, Reto ;
McGinlay, James ;
Graves, Anil R. ;
Morris, Joe ;
Bradbury, Richard B. ;
King, Helen ;
Bullock, James M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 206 :1145-1154
[60]  
Rodríguez JP, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11