The Impact of Transaction Utility on Consumer Decisions The Role of Loss Aversion and Acquisition Utility

被引:9
作者
Muehlbacher, Stephan [1 ]
Kirchler, Erich [1 ]
Kunz, Angelika [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Econ Psychol Educ Psychol & Evaluat, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY | 2011年 / 219卷 / 04期
关键词
consumer psychology; reference prices; transaction utility; acquisition utility; loss aversion; PROSPECT-THEORY; PRICE; PERCEPTIONS; FAIRNESS;
D O I
10.1027/2151-2604/a000075
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In consumption decisions, Thaler (1985) distinguishes acquisition and transaction utility. Whereas acquisition utility stands for the pleasure from obtaining a good, transaction utility denominates the value consumers derive from the deal itself. Transaction utility depends on a comparison of actual prices with reference to other prices such as the regular price. The present article reports two experimental studies demonstrating the effect of transaction utility on purchase decisions. In Experiment 1 (N = 90), on the basis of prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979), it is expected that negative transaction utility affects purchase decisions to a higher degree than its positive counterpart. Results support this hypothesis. In Experiment 2 (N = 121) it is hypothesized that acquisition utility moderates the effect of transaction utility, that is, transaction utility becomes less important if a product is desired primarily for its actual value. Though both forms of utility affected purchase intentions, no support for the moderation hypothesis was observed.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 223
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[2]   Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences [J].
Campbell, MC .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1999, 36 (02) :187-199
[3]   Fairness and discounts: The subjective value of a bargain [J].
Darke, PR ;
Dahl, DW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :328-338
[4]   The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions [J].
Grewal, D ;
Monroe, KB ;
Krishnan, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1998, 62 (02) :46-59
[5]   Pleasant surprises: Consumer response to unexpected in-store coupons [J].
Heilman, CM ;
Nakamoto, K ;
Rao, AG .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (02) :242-252
[6]   EDLP, HI-LO, AND MARGIN ARITHMETIC [J].
HOCH, SJ ;
DREZE, X ;
PURK, ME .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1994, 58 (04) :16-27
[7]   Customers' reactions to price increases: Do customer satisfaction and perceived motive fairness matter? [J].
Homburg, C ;
Hoyer, WD ;
Koschate, N .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2005, 33 (01) :36-49
[8]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[9]   CONSUMER PRICE AND PROMOTION EXPECTATIONS - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY [J].
KALWANI, MU ;
YIM, CK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (01) :90-100
[10]   EMPIRICAL GENERALIZATIONS FROM REFERENCE PRICE RESEARCH [J].
KALYANARAM, G ;
WINER, RS .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1995, 14 (03) :G161-G169