Improvements in the measurement of creep crack initiation and growth using potential drop

被引:11
作者
Tarnowski, K. M. [1 ]
Nikbin, K. M. [1 ]
Dean, D. W. [2 ]
Davies, C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Mech Engn, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] EDF Energy, Barnett Way, Barnwood GL4 3RS, Glos, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Creep crack initiation; Creep crack growth; Potential drop method; Strain; Finite element analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.037
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
To predict the residual life of components operating in the creep regime, it is vital to accurately identify crack initiation, and measure subsequent crack growth, in laboratory tests. Potential drop (PD) measurements, used for this purpose, are susceptible to errors caused by the accumulation of creep strain. For creep ductile materials, this can result in highly conservative crack initiation models and the implementation of unnecessary inspection and maintenance programmes that can cost millions of pounds in lost revenue. Conversely, the crack growth models can be non-conservative. Using a novel combination of interrupted creep crack growth (CCG) tests and sequentially coupled structural-electrical finite element analyses a new method of interpreting PD data has been developed and validated. It uses an increase in gradient on a plot of PD vs. load-line displacement to accurately identify crack initiation. This has been compared to the current method in ASTM E1457-15 by reanalysing data from CCG tests performed on a range of materials at various temperatures and loads. The initiation times, measured using the current ASTM method, were underestimated by factors of up to 23 and the subsequent crack growth rates were underestimated by factors of up to 1.5. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 248
页数:20
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ASTM STP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PROTOGEN 0101
[3]  
Baker A., 2004, EREPBDBB0050AGR04 BR
[4]  
Bakker A., 1985, ASTM STP, V856, P394, DOI DOI 10.1520/STP345375
[5]  
*BEGL, 2000, R6 REV 4 ASS INT STR
[6]  
Bettinson A.D., 2001, The Influence of Constraint on the Creep Crack Growth in 316H Stainless Steel
[7]  
COMSOL, 2012, MULT V4 3A
[8]  
Dean D. W., 2004, EREPBDBB0040GEN03 BR
[9]   Relation between crack growth behaviour and crack front morphology under hold-time conditions in DA Inconel 718 [J].
Fessler, E. ;
Andrieu, E. ;
Bonnand, V. ;
Chiaruttini, V. ;
Pierret, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2017, 96 :17-27
[10]  
Freeman B. L., 1980, MEASUREMENT CRACK LE