Web Analytics for User Experience: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:7
作者
Palomino, Fryda [1 ]
Paz, Freddy [1 ]
Moquillaza, Arturo [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Peru, Av Univ 1801, Lima 32, Peru
来源
DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY: UX RESEARCH AND DESIGN, DUXU 2021, PT I | 2021年 / 12779卷
关键词
User experience; Web analytics; Systematic review; Human-computer interaction; WEBSITE; USABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-78221-4_21
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
User experience is an essential software quality concept for companies nowadays. Development teams attempt to guarantee that their digital products provide a satisfying experience. Likewise, several evaluation methods have emerged to determine if the software product's interfaces are understandable, intuitive, and attractive to users. However, few of these methods suggest the use of data analytics for user experience evaluation. Many companies use tools that allow them to obtain multiple data about using their leading websites but do not use this information to generate relevant results that can be used to improve the design of their graphical interfaces. In this study, we present the results of conducting a systematic literature review to identify case studies that report web analytics usage to evaluate websites' user experience. The search retrieved a total of 315 papers. The databases used for this review were: Scopus, Web of Science, IEEExplore, and ACM Digital Library. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 relevant articles were obtained, which have allowed answering the research questions. The results show a tendency to incorporate data analysis to explain specific design problems or usability issues. Additionally, we have identified some methodological proposals that have been established on how to use data analytics for the user experience evaluation process and some metrics that could offer relevant information about the degree of ease of use of a website.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 326
页数:15
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Hartson R, 2019, BACKGROUND UX EVALUA, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-805342-3.00028-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805342-3.00028-X]
  • [12] Hartson R., 2019, UX BOOK, P3, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-805342-3.00001-1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805342-3.00001-1]
  • [13] Hasan L, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5619, P697, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_81
  • [14] Evaluation of eMentalHealth. ca, a Canadian Mental Health Website Portal: Mixed Methods Assessment
    Jeong, Dahn
    Cheng, Michael
    St-Jean, Mireille
    Jalali, Alireza
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 6 (09):
  • [15] Jokela T., 2004, Interactions, V11, P29, DOI 10.1145/1029036.1029050
  • [16] Kaur K., 2015, INT J COMPUT SCI ENG, V5
  • [17] Kaur K, 2016, PROCEEDINGS ON 2016 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEXT GENERATION COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (NGCT), P608, DOI 10.1109/NGCT.2016.7877485
  • [18] Kaushik A, 2009, WEB ANALYTICS 2 0 AR
  • [19] Kitchenham B., 2007, Technical Report
  • [20] Kumar Ratnakar, 2017, 2017 2nd International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES). Proceedings, P350, DOI 10.1109/CESYS.2017.8321296