Do Distinct CSR Categories have Distinct Determinants? The Roles of Market Structure and Firm Size

被引:25
作者
Acabado, Daniela Rodrigues [1 ]
Branca, Ana Sofia [2 ]
Catalao-Lopes, Margarida [2 ]
Pina, Joaquim Pires [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Inst Super Tecn CEG IST, Ctr Management Studies, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Nova Lisboa, Fac Ciencias Tecnol, CEFAGE FCT UNL, Dept Ciencias Sociais Aplicadas, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
corporate social responsibility categories; market structure; firm size; industry; geography; regulatory and macroeconomic effects; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; FAMILY FIRMS; DIMENSIONS; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1111/emre.12341
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite the existing vast literature on corporate social responsibility (CSR), there is a lack of research on the determinants of CSR categories - environment, employees, community, and governance. Why do some firms dedicate more effort to community, while others focus on environment or employees? We address these issues with special attention to the roles of market structure and firm size, controlling for industry, geography, regulatory and macroeconomic variables. Answers are relevant for firms' strategic decisions, taking into account what rivals likely choose, in a world where CSR is often a competition tool. Public authorities also benefit on choosing focus: lack of competition; small or large sized firms; which categories are more affected. We find that all CSR categories profit more from a competitive setup, particularly employees and environment, and from larger firms, mainly environment. Size and market concentration thus contribute in different directions to CSR, contradicting their usually presumed positive association.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 17
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
AGARWAL NC, 1979, ACAD MANAGE J, V22, P404, DOI 10.5465/255598
[2]  
Aggarwal P., 2013, IOSR J BUSINESS MANA, V13, P1, DOI [DOI 10.9790/487X-1330105, https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-1330105, 10.9790/487x-1330105]
[3]   The changing role of governments in corporate social responsibility: drivers and responses [J].
Albareda, Laura ;
Lozano, Josep M. ;
Tencati, Antonio ;
Midttun, Atle ;
Perrini, Francesco .
BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2008, 17 (04) :347-363
[4]   Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type [J].
Banerjee, SB ;
Iyer, ES ;
Kashyap, RK .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2003, 67 (02) :106-122
[5]   The Extensiveness of Corporate Social and Environmental Commitment across Firms over Time [J].
Bansal, Pratima ;
Gao, Jijun ;
Qureshi, Israr .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2014, 35 (07) :949-966
[6]  
Baron D., 2006, RES PAPERS
[7]   The Industrial Organization of Private Politics [J].
Baron, David P. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (02) :135-174
[8]  
Baumann-Pauly D., 2011, PACT MONDIALE NATION, P125
[9]   Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Benabou, Roland ;
Tirole, Jean .
ECONOMICA, 2010, 77 (305) :1-19
[10]   The Effect of Family Ownership on Different Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Large US Firms [J].
Block, Joern H. ;
Wagner, Marcus .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (07) :475-492