Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution

被引:82
作者
Titone, D
机构
[1] McLean Hosp, Psychol Res Lab, Belmont, MA 02478 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/brln.1998.1998
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Three experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of contextual constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution in the cerebral hemispheres. A cross-modal priming variant of the divided visual field task was utilized in which subjects heard sentences containing homonyms and made lexical decisions to targets semantically related to dominant and subordinate meanings. Experiment 1 showed priming in both hemispheres of dominant meanings for homonyms embedded in neutral sentence contexts. Experiment 2 showed priming in both hemispheres of dominant and subordinate meanings for homonyms embedded in sentence contexts that biased a central semantic feature of the subordinate meaning. Experiment 3 showed priming of dominant meanings in the left hemisphere (LH), and priming of the subordinate meaning in the right hemisphere (RH) for homonyms embedded in sentences that biased a peripheral semantic feature of the subordinate meaning. These results are consistent with a context-sensitive model of language processing that incorporates differential sensitivity to semantic relationships in the cerebral hemispheres. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 394
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ACCESSING LEXICAL AMBIGUITY - EFFECTS OF CONTEXT AND DOMINANCE
    TABOSSI, P
    COLOMBO, L
    JOB, R
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1987, 49 (2-3): : 161 - 167
  • [32] N400 and the resolution of lexical ambiguity
    Hoop, M
    Gajewski, P
    Kühn, D
    Winkelhausen, U
    Niedeggen, M
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (02) : 132 - 132
  • [33] The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution
    Hoang Vu
    George Kellas
    Ktmberly Metcalf
    Ruth Herman
    Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28 : 236 - 252
  • [34] Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution
    Traxler, MJ
    Pickering, MJ
    Clifton, C
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 39 (04) : 558 - 592
  • [35] The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution
    Vu, H
    Kellas, G
    Metcalf, K
    Herman, R
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (02) : 236 - 252
  • [36] MULTIPLE CONSTRAINTS ON LEXICAL CATEGORY AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION
    MACDONALD, MC
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1992, 30 (06) : 471 - 471
  • [37] Cognitive inhibition during lexical ambiguity resolution:: A highfield functional MRI study
    Hönig, K
    Scheef, L
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (03) : 155 - 156
  • [38] Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice
    Lynne C. Nygaard
    Erin R. Lunders
    Memory & Cognition, 2002, 30 : 583 - 593
  • [39] Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution
    Hoang Vu
    George Kellas
    Stephen T. Paul
    Memory & Cognition, 1998, 26 : 979 - 1001
  • [40] Eye Movements in English Lexical Ambiguity Resolution
    Tang, Huijun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGLISH LINGUISTICS, 2018, 8 (02) : 148 - 152