Gestational Diabetes and the New Screening Test's Impact

被引:6
作者
Massa, Ana Catarina [1 ]
Rangel, Ricardo [2 ]
Cardoso, Manuela [3 ]
Campos, Ana [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Serv Med Maternofetal Maternidade Alfredo Costa, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Hosp Curry Cabral, Serv Endocrinol, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Serv Nutr Maternidade Alfredo Costa, Lisbon, Portugal
来源
ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA | 2015年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
Gestational Diabetes; Mass Screening; PREGNANCY; HYPERGLYCEMIA; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.20344/amp.5345
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: In 2011, a new screening test for gestational diabetes was introduced which allowed an earlier and larger diagnosis with the goal of reducing maternal and perinatal complications. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of gestational diabetes, compare maternal and perinatal outcomes with the previous and present screening tests and analyze postpartum screening results. Material and Methods: Retrospective study of women with singletons and gestational diabetes diagnosed during 2009 (n = 223) and 2012 (n = 237), at Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Portugal. Analysis of clinical charts and assessment of demographic data, medical and obstetric history, weight gain during pregnancy, gestational age at diagnosis, treatment regimens, neonatal outcomes and postpartum screening results, followed by comparison of these variables between the years of 2009 and 2012. Results: In 2012, there was an increased gestational diabetes prevalence, lower weight gain during pregnancy (p < 0.001), more frequent use of pharmacological therapy (p < 0.001) and more diagnosed cases during first and second trimester (p < 0.001). As for neonatal outcomes, in this group, the medium weight at birth was significantly lower (p = 0.001) with a decrease of newborns great for gestational age (p = 0.002). Postpartum screening rate was similar among both groups but in 2012 there was an increase of normal results and a decrease of impaired fasting glucose. Discussion: Tighter criteria of the current screening test resulted in reduction of the majority of gestational diabetes complications but raised new questions. Conclusion: The introduction of the current screening test resulted in an increased prevalence, earlier diagnosis and reduction of macrosomia.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Ali F M, 2013, Ir Med J, V106, P57
  • [3] Dores J., 2011, Relatorio de Consenso Diabetes e Gravidez
  • [4] Clinical impact of women with gestational diabetes mellitus by the new consensus criteria: two year experience in a single institution in Japan
    Ikenoue, Satoru
    Miyakoshi, Kei
    Saisho, Yoshifumi
    Sakai, Kensuke
    Kasuga, Yoshifumi
    Fukutake, Marie
    Izumi, Yoko
    Matsumoto, Tadashi
    Minegishi, Kazuhiro
    Yoshimura, Yasunori
    [J]. ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2014, 61 (04) : 353 - 358
  • [5] Landon M, 2013, OBSTET GYNECOL, V122, P406
  • [6] Metzger BE, 2008, NEW ENGL J MED, V358, P1991, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943
  • [7] International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Recommendations on the Diagnosis and Classification of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy
    Metzger, Boyd E.
    Gabbe, Steven G.
    Persson, Bengt
    Buchanan, Thomas A.
    Catalano, Patrick M.
    Damm, Peter
    Dyer, Alan R.
    de Leiva, Alberto
    Hod, Moshe
    Kitzmiller, John L.
    Lowe, Lynn P.
    McIntyre, H. David
    Oats, Jeremy J. N.
    Omori, Yasue
    Schmidt, Maria Ines
    Balaji, Vijayam
    Callaghan, William M.
    Chen, Rony
    Conway, Deborah
    Corcoy, Rosa
    Coustan, Donald R.
    Dabelea, Dana
    Fagen, Cathy
    Feig, Denice S.
    Ferrara, Assiamira
    Geil, Patti
    Hadden, David R.
    Hillier, Teresa A.
    Hiramatsu, Yuji
    Houde, Ghislaine
    Inturissi, Maribeth
    Jang, Hak C
    Jovanovic, Lois
    Kautsky-Willer, Alexandra
    Kirkman, M. Sue
    Kjos, Siri L.
    Landon, Mark B.
    Lapolla, Annunziata
    Lowe, Julia
    Mathiesen, H. Elisabeth R.
    Mello, Giorgio
    Meltzer, Sara J.
    Moore, Thomas R.
    Nolan, Christopher J.
    Ovesen, Per
    Pettitt, David
    Reader, Diane M.
    Rowan, Janet A.
    Sacks, David A.
    Schaefer-Graf, Ute
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (03) : 676 - 682
  • [8] Nwose Ezekiel Uba, 2013, N Am J Med Sci, V5, P191, DOI 10.4103/1947-2714.109184
  • [9] The diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes: to change or not to change?
    Reece, E. Albert
    Moore, Thomas
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (04) : 255 - 259
  • [10] Expanding the Screening for Diabetes in Pregnancy Overmedicalization or the Right Thing To Do?
    Saade, George R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (02) : 195 - 197