Breast cancer screening interventions in selected counties across US regions

被引:1
作者
Austin, Shamly [3 ]
Martin, Michelle Y. [1 ]
Levine, Robert S. [4 ]
Pisu, Maria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Div Prevent Med, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, COERE, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Hlth Serv Adm, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Meharry Med Coll, Dept Family & Community Med, Nashville, TN 37208 USA
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Interventions; Evidence-based interventions; Disparities; AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN; PROMOTE MAMMOGRAPHY; DISPARITIES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-010-9636-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the types of, and the populations targeted by interventions implemented to increase breast cancer screening rates in counties with large African American populations across different US regions. Methods A brief questionnaire was administered by e-mail to county representatives from 33 states from October 2008 through March 2009. Responses were obtained from 33% of 203 targeted counties. Results Most counties (>80%) reported interventions for African American women and for women with low income. Women were exposed to different kinds of interventions depending on where they lived. Most counties in the Northeast (93%), Southwest (82%), and Midwest (100%) implemented interventions that provided free or low cost mammograms. Counties in the Southeast (83%) were more likely to report education interventions. Counties from the Southwest reported using a variety of interventions to encourage breast cancer screening. Conclusion In this selected group of counties, different types of interventions were used to increase breast cancer screening in minority and disadvantaged women. Interventions implemented were similar to those shown in the literature to be effective in increasing screening rates in specific populations. Future research should examine the use of screening interventions in a larger sample of US counties.
引用
收藏
页码:2165 / 2172
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2009, WHAT AR KEY STAT BRE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CANC FACTS FIG AFR A
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM CANC SOC RESP CHA
[4]   A systematic review of mammography educational interventions for low-income women [J].
Bailey, TM ;
Delva, J ;
Gretebeck, K ;
Siefert, K ;
Ismail, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2005, 20 (02) :96-107
[5]   Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening [J].
Baron, Roy C. ;
Rimer, Barbara K. ;
Breslow, Rosalind A. ;
Coates, Ralph J. ;
Kerner, Jon ;
Melillo, Stephanie ;
Habarta, Nancy ;
Kalra, Geetika P. ;
Chattopadhyay, Sajal ;
Wilson, Katherine M. ;
Lee, Nancy C. ;
Mullen, Patricia Dolan ;
Coughlin, Steven S. ;
Briss, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (01) :S34-S55
[6]   A review of effective strategies for native women's breast health outreach and education [J].
Burhansstipanov, L ;
Krebs, LU ;
Grass, R ;
Wanliss, EJ ;
Saslow, D .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2005, 20 (01) :71-79
[7]  
*CDCP, 2009, BREAST CANC
[8]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009, GUID COMM PREV SERV
[9]   Collaborative breast health intervention for African American women of lower socioeconomic status [J].
Fowler, BA ;
Rodney, M ;
Roberts, S ;
Broadus, L .
ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2005, 32 (06) :1207-1216
[10]   A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Promote Mammography Among Ethnic Minority Women [J].
Han, Hae-Ra ;
Lee, Jong-Eun ;
Kim, Jiyun ;
Hedlin, Haley K. ;
Song, Heejung ;
Kim, Miyong T. .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2009, 58 (04) :246-254