Ecomorphological variation in male and female wall lizards and the macroevolution of sexual dimorphism in relation to habitat use

被引:42
作者
Kaliontzopoulou, A. [1 ,2 ]
Carretero, M. A. [1 ]
Adams, D. C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, CIBIO Res Ctr Biodivers & Genet Resources, InBIO, Campus Agr Vairao,Rua Padre Armando Quintas 7, P-4485661 Vairao, Vila Do Conde, Portugal
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Organismal Biol, Ames, IA USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Stat, Ames, IA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
mode; phenotype; shape; size; tempo; BODY-SIZE; LACERTID LIZARDS; BITE-FORCE; EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS; STABILIZING SELECTION; PODARCIS-HISPANICA; PERFORMANCE; MORPHOLOGY; PATTERNS; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1111/jeb.12540
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding how phenotypic diversity evolves is a major interest of evolutionary biology. Habitat use is an important factor in the evolution of phenotypic diversity of many animal species. Interestingly, male and female phenotypes have been frequently shown to respond differently to environmental variation. At the macroevolutionary level, this difference between the sexes is frequently analysed using phylogenetic comparative tools to assess variation in sexual dimorphism (SD) across taxa in relation to habitat. A shortcoming of such analyses is that they evaluate the degree of dimorphism itself and therefore they do not provide access to the evolutionary trajectories of each sex. As such, the relative contribution of male and female phenotypes on macroevolutionary patterns of sexual dimorphism cannot be directly assessed. Here, we investigate how habitat use shapes phenotypic diversity in wall lizards using phylogenetic comparative tools to simultaneously assess the tempo and mode of evolution in males, females and the degree of sexual dimorphism. We find that both sexes have globally diversified under similar, but not identical, processes, where habitat use seems to drive macroevolutionary variation in head shape, but not in body size or relative limb length. However, we also observe small differences in the evolutionary dynamics of male and female phenotypes that have a marked impact on macroevolutionary patterns of SD, with important implications for our interpretation of what drives phenotypic diversification within and between the sexes.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 94
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Comparing Evolutionary Rates for Different Phenotypic Traits on a Phylogeny Using Likelihood [J].
Adams, Dean C. .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2013, 62 (02) :181-192
[2]   The use of a lacertid lizard as a model for reptile ecotoxicology studies - Part 1 Field demographics and morphology [J].
Amaral, Maria Jose ;
Carretero, Miguel A. ;
Bicho, Rita C. ;
Soares, Amadeu M. V. M. ;
Mann, Reinier M. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 87 (07) :757-764
[3]  
Amo L, 2003, COPEIA, P899
[4]  
Andersson M., 1994, SEXUAL SELECTION, P247, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTVS32S1X.15
[5]  
[Anonymous], BIOL J LINN SOC
[6]  
Arnold E.N., 2004, P11
[7]   Resource partition among lacertid lizards in southern Europe [J].
Arnold, E. N. .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1987, 1 :739-782
[8]  
Arnold E.N., 1998, Bulletin of the Natural History Museum Zoology Series, V64, P63
[9]  
Arnold E.N., 1973, Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology), V29, P289
[10]   MORPHOLOGY, PERFORMANCE AND FITNESS [J].
ARNOLD, SJ .
AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 1983, 23 (02) :347-361