Recent academic studies indicate that acquirers' cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) decline from deal to deal in acquisition programs. Does this pattern suggest hubristic CEO behaviors are significant enough to influence average CAR patterns during acquisition programs? An alternative explanation is CEO learning. This study therefore tests for learning using successive acquisitions of large U.S. public targets undertaken by U.S. acquirers. A dynamic framework reveals that both rational and hubristic CEOs take on average investor reactions to their previous deals into account and adjust their bidding behavior accordingly. These results are consistent with a learning hypothesis. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Grad Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Grad Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Subrahmanyam, A
;
Titman, S
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Grad Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
机构:
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Grad Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USAUniv Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Grad Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
Subrahmanyam, A
;
Titman, S
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Grad Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA