Platform for monitoring accuracy of on orbit cross calibration : Infrared Atmospheric Sounder onboard FY-3 satellite

被引:1
作者
Qi Cheng-Li [1 ]
Xu Han-Lie [1 ]
Hu Xiu-Qing [1 ]
Yin De-Kui [2 ]
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm LRCVES CMA, Natl Satellite Meteorol Ctr, Key Lab Radiometr Calibrat & Validat Environm Sat, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Inst Technol Phys, Shanghai 200083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FY-3; satellite; IRAS; calibration accuracy monitoring; cross calibration; INTERCALIBRATION; CHANNELS; AIRS; IASI;
D O I
10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2016.03.015
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
For quantitative remote sensing, instrument calibration precision should be monitored from time to time. To monitor the accuracy of cross calibration of FY-3C satellite Infrared Atmospheric Sounder(IRAS), a platform was set up based on a cross comparison of IRAS with standard infrared high spectral resolution instruments- Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI). Calibration precision monitoring analysis using IRAS data in the year of 2014 shows results as the following. For all the 20 infrared channels the correlation coefficients of IRAS with IASI were above 0.98. The mean bias for most channels are less than 1K except that channels 9 and 16 are nearly 1.4 K and channels 1 and 18 are larger than 2 K. The standard deviation for most channels is less than 1.5 K, while for surface sounding bands of 8, 9, 18, 19, and 20, it ranges from 1.5 to 3 K. The latter is probably due to that the channels which detect atmosphere of near boundary layer were more susceptible to the time and location differences. The calibration bias variation trend with target brightness temperature was flat for channel 2, 3, 4, 10 to 13, while an obvious trend can be seen for channels of 14 to 20 and the difference between maximum bias and minimum bias can reach 5 K. Time series analysis of calibration bias indicates that for most channels the calibration bias were stable in one year and the variation magnitude was less than 0.3 K. It is about 1 K for channel 15, 19, and 20. The calibration bias variation reached 2 to 4 K in one year for channel 1, 14, 16, 17, 18. In a word, IRAS cross calibration accuracy monitoring system provide a tool for real time monitoring of calibration precision change.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 349
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, CGMS27USAWP21
  • [2] Spectral Bias Estimation of Historical HIRS Using IASI Observations for Improved Fundamental Climate Data Records
    Cao, Changyong
    Goldberg, Mitch
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 26 (07) : 1378 - 1387
  • [3] Intercalibration of Broadband Geostationary Imagers Using AIRS
    Gunshor, Mathew M.
    Schmit, Timothy J.
    Menzel, W. Paul
    Tobin, David C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 26 (04) : 746 - 758
  • [4] Hewison T J, 2013, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V51, P1171
  • [5] Ice Contamination of Meteosat/SEVIRI Implied by Intercalibration Against Metop/IASI
    Hewison, Tim J.
    Mueller, Johannes
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (03): : 1182 - 1186
  • [6] Long-Term Monitoring and Correction of FY-2 Infrared Channel Calibration Using AIRS and IASI
    Hu, Xiuqing
    Xu, Na
    Weng, Fuzhong
    Zhang, Yong
    Chen, Lin
    Zhang, Peng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (10): : 5008 - 5018
  • [7] Konig M, 2000, CGMS28EUWP16
  • [8] Mittaz J P D, 2009, ATMOS OCEAN TECHNOL, V26, P996
  • [9] QI Cheng-li, 2014, ASIA PACIFIC REMOTE, P9264
  • [10] [漆成莉 Qi Chengli], 2012, [气象学报, Acta Meteorologica Sinica], V70, P892