Identifying Functions and Behaviours of Social Robots for In-Class Learning Activities: Teachers' Perspective

被引:17
作者
Ceha, Jessy [1 ]
Law, Edith [1 ]
Kulic, Dana [2 ]
Oudeyer, Pierre-Yves [3 ]
Roy, Didier [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic 3800, Australia
[3] Ctr Inria Bordeaux Sud Ouest, 200 Ave Vieille Tour, F-33405 Talence, France
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Social robots; Education; Activity theory; Teachers; CHILDREN TEACH; 2ND-LANGUAGE; PEER;
D O I
10.1007/s12369-021-00820-7
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With advances in artificial intelligence, research is increasingly exploring the potential functions that social robots can play in education. As teachers are a critical stakeholder in the use and application of educational technologies, we conducted a study to understand teachers' perspectives on how a social robot could support a variety of learning activities in the classroom. Through interviews, robot puppeteering, and group brainstorming sessions with five elementary and middle school teachers from a local school in Canada, we take a socio-technical perspective to conceptualize possible robot functions and behaviours, and the effects they may have on the current way learning activities are designed, planned, and executed. Overall, the teachers responded positively to the idea of introducing a social robot as a technological tool for learning activities, envisioning differences in usage for teacher-robot and student-robot interactions. Further, Engestrom's Activity System Model-a framework for analyzing human needs, tasks, and outcomes-illustrated a number of tensions associated with learning activities in the classroom. We discuss the fine-grained robot functions and behaviours conceived by teachers, and how they address the current tensions-providing suggestions for improving the design of social robots for learning activities.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 761
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
[51]   Teachers' Perspectives on Social Robots in Education: An Exploratory Case Study [J].
van Ewijk, Gijs ;
Smakman, Matthijs ;
Konijn, Elly A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF IDC 2020, 2020, :273-280
[52]   Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review [J].
Vavassori Benitti, Fabiane Barreto .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (03) :978-988
[53]  
Westlund JK, 2016, ACMIEEE INT CONF HUM, P383, DOI 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451776
[54]   ON UNDERSTANDING COMPUTERS AND COGNITION - A NEW FOUNDATION FOR DESIGN - WINOGRAD,T, FLORES,F [J].
WINOGRAD, T ;
FLORES, F .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1987, 31 (02) :250-261
[55]  
Yardi S, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P3237
[56]  
You Z.-J., 2006, 6 IEEE INT C ADV LEA, P87, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICALT.2006.1652373
[57]   The Effect of a Robot's Social Character on Children's Task Engagement: Peer Versus Tutor [J].
Zaga, Cristina ;
Lohse, Manja ;
Truong, Khiet P. ;
Evers, Vanessa .
SOCIAL ROBOTICS (ICSR 2015), 2015, 9388 :704-713