Optimal wastewater allocation with the development of an SECA multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:28
|
作者
Azbari, Kosar Ebrahimzadeh [1 ]
Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat [1 ]
Golfam, Parvin [2 ]
Singh, Vijay P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Qom, Dept Civil Engn, Qom, Iran
[2] Univ Qom, Dept Civil Engn, Civil Engn, Qom, Iran
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Zachry Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
Optimal wastewater allocation; SECA multi-Objective decision-making method; Multi-objective non-linear programming; Optimization the overall performance of the alternatives; Lingo software; REUSE; IRRIGATION; GROUNDWATER; ADAPTATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129041
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to develop a multi-objective decision-making method, named Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for optimal ranking of wastewater allocation alternatives. This multi-objective decision-making method is for the continuous environment, meaning that experts can choose the best solution among the solutions obtained. The SECA multi-objective non-linear programming method has three objective functions: (i) maximization of the overall performance of alternatives, (ii) minimization of the deviation of criterion weights from reference point based on the within-criteria variation information, and (iii) minimization of the deviation of criterion weights based on the between-criteria variation information as well as two limitations for the weights of criteria. First, 15 criteria from different fields, including economic, socio-cultural, technological, and environmental, and six alternatives were determined for reusing wastewater, including reuse in the industrial sector, for recreational consumption, supplying environmental demand, artificial aquifer recharge, agricultural irrigation, and landscape irrigation. Then, decision-making matrix was constructed and reference points were calculated. By programming the SECA code in Lingo software and considering different beta values, different weights for criteria and alternatives were ranked. In the other words, determining the best value for beta was the most important step, so different values for beta from 0.1 to 10 were examined. Results showed that in the value of beta equal to 4, the maximum value of the objective function was obtained as 0.6926. Therefore, it was the best value for beta and the weight of the effects on water resources criterion was equal to 0.0957 and was the most important criterion, and the allocation alternative in the environmental sector with a score of 0.8575 was the best wastewater allocation alternative. Followed by the environmental sector alternative, landscape irrigation, industrial sector, artificial aquifer recharge, agricultural irrigation, and recreational consumption were placed. Therefore, water supply for the environmental sector by considering the effect of wastewater on water resources is the best alternative for optimal allocation of wastewater.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A multi-criteria decision-making support system for choice of method of compensation for highway construction contractors in Greece
    Antoniou, Fani
    Aretoulis, Georgios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 19 (06) : 492 - 508
  • [42] Cloud service evaluation method-based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: A systematic literature review
    Alabool, Hamzeh
    Kamil, Ahmad
    Arshad, Noreen
    Alarabiat, Deemah
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2018, 139 : 161 - 188
  • [43] A Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Assess Emergency Suppliers
    Li, Huilin
    Yang, Jiaqi
    Xiang, Ziquan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [44] Sustainability in Forest Management Revisited Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques
    Ezquerro, Marta
    Pardos, Marta
    Diaz-Balteiro, Luis
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13)
  • [45] A REVIEW OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR BUILDING ASSESSMENT, SELECTION, AND RETROFIT
    Villalba, Paola
    Sanchez-garrido, Antonio J.
    Yepes, Victor
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 30 (05) : 465 - 480
  • [46] Breast Cancer Screening Based on Supervised Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Mustapha, Mubarak Taiwo
    Ozsahin, Dilber Uzun
    Ozsahin, Ilker
    Uzun, Berna
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [47] The CAR Method for Using Preference Strength in Multi-criteria Decision Making
    Danielson, Mats
    Ekenberg, Love
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2016, 25 (04) : 775 - 797
  • [48] Identifying Alternative Options for Chatbots With Multi-Criteria Decision-Making A Comparative Study
    Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan
    Singh, Harshit Kumar
    Sakshi, Surabhi
    Zhang, Justin Zuopeng
    Li, Qiuzheng
    JOURNAL OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 35 (01)
  • [49] Participatory multi-criteria decision making for optimal siting of multipurpose artificial reservoirs
    Masi, Matteo
    Arrighi, Chiara
    Piragino, Francesco
    Castelli, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 370
  • [50] An outranking method for multi-criteria decision making with duplex linguistic information
    Yang, Wu-E
    Wang, Jian-Qiang
    Wang, Xin-Fan
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2012, 198 : 20 - 33