Optimal wastewater allocation with the development of an SECA multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:28
|
作者
Azbari, Kosar Ebrahimzadeh [1 ]
Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat [1 ]
Golfam, Parvin [2 ]
Singh, Vijay P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Qom, Dept Civil Engn, Qom, Iran
[2] Univ Qom, Dept Civil Engn, Civil Engn, Qom, Iran
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Zachry Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
Optimal wastewater allocation; SECA multi-Objective decision-making method; Multi-objective non-linear programming; Optimization the overall performance of the alternatives; Lingo software; REUSE; IRRIGATION; GROUNDWATER; ADAPTATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129041
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to develop a multi-objective decision-making method, named Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for optimal ranking of wastewater allocation alternatives. This multi-objective decision-making method is for the continuous environment, meaning that experts can choose the best solution among the solutions obtained. The SECA multi-objective non-linear programming method has three objective functions: (i) maximization of the overall performance of alternatives, (ii) minimization of the deviation of criterion weights from reference point based on the within-criteria variation information, and (iii) minimization of the deviation of criterion weights based on the between-criteria variation information as well as two limitations for the weights of criteria. First, 15 criteria from different fields, including economic, socio-cultural, technological, and environmental, and six alternatives were determined for reusing wastewater, including reuse in the industrial sector, for recreational consumption, supplying environmental demand, artificial aquifer recharge, agricultural irrigation, and landscape irrigation. Then, decision-making matrix was constructed and reference points were calculated. By programming the SECA code in Lingo software and considering different beta values, different weights for criteria and alternatives were ranked. In the other words, determining the best value for beta was the most important step, so different values for beta from 0.1 to 10 were examined. Results showed that in the value of beta equal to 4, the maximum value of the objective function was obtained as 0.6926. Therefore, it was the best value for beta and the weight of the effects on water resources criterion was equal to 0.0957 and was the most important criterion, and the allocation alternative in the environmental sector with a score of 0.8575 was the best wastewater allocation alternative. Followed by the environmental sector alternative, landscape irrigation, industrial sector, artificial aquifer recharge, agricultural irrigation, and recreational consumption were placed. Therefore, water supply for the environmental sector by considering the effect of wastewater on water resources is the best alternative for optimal allocation of wastewater.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method with Belief Preference Relations
    Ennaceur, Amel
    Elouedi, Zied
    Lefevre, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 22 (04) : 573 - 590
  • [32] Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Engineering Applications
    Nabavi, Seyed Reza
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 62 (17) : 6707 - 6722
  • [33] Manufacturing Industry Performance Appraisals: Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Andriani, Debrina Puspita
    Wijayanti, Febry
    Rahmani, Ilma Visi
    Aini, Azizah Putri Nur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, 2022, 14 (06): : 28 - 37
  • [34] Optimal Selection of Sewage Treatment Technologies in Town Areas: A Coupled Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Liu, Ben
    Tang, Jie
    Li, Zhaoyang
    Yan, Yu
    Chen, Jingshu
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 66 (04) : 709 - 721
  • [35] Multi-criteria decision analysis in adaptation decision-making: a flood case study in Finland
    Porthin, Markus
    Rosqvist, Tony
    Perrels, Adriaan
    Molarius, Riitta
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2013, 13 (06) : 1171 - 1180
  • [36] Multi-criteria decision analysis in adaptation decision-making: a flood case study in Finland
    Markus Porthin
    Tony Rosqvist
    Adriaan Perrels
    Riitta Molarius
    Regional Environmental Change, 2013, 13 : 1171 - 1180
  • [37] Synergetic Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models to Credit Granting Decision Problems
    Garcia, Vicente
    Salvador Sanchez, J.
    Marques, Ana I.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (23):
  • [38] Multi-criteria decision-making model for EPC contractor prequalification: a hybrid approach
    Amiri, Omid
    Rahimi, Mahmoud
    Ayazi, Amir
    Khazaeni, Garshasb
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILDING PATHOLOGY AND ADAPTATION, 2024, 42 (03) : 369 - 385
  • [39] Contractor selection by using multi-criteria decision-making for Egyptian road maintenance
    Fawzy, Mohamed Mahmoud
    Elsharkawy, Ahmed Shawky
    Khalifa, Yasser Aly
    Hassan, Abbas Atef
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 15 (06) : 2351 - 2365
  • [40] Development of a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating the Comprehensive Application of Herbaceous Peony at Low Latitudes
    Wang, Xiaobin
    Zhang, Runlong
    Zhang, Kaijing
    Shao, Lingmei
    Xu, Tong
    Shi, Xiaohua
    Li, Danqing
    Zhang, Jiaping
    Xia, Yiping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (22)