Analysis of two topotecan treatment schedules in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer e
被引:5
作者:
Bruchim, Ilan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Meir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, IsraelMeir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Bruchim, Ilan
[1
,2
]
Ben-Harim, Zipi
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Meir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, IsraelMeir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Ben-Harim, Zipi
[1
,2
]
Piura, Ettie
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Meir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, IsraelMeir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Piura, Ettie
[1
,2
]
Haran, Gabi
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Meir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, IsraelMeir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Haran, Gabi
[1
,2
]
Fishman, Ami
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Meir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, IsraelMeir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
Fishman, Ami
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Meir Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, 59 Tschernihovsky St, IL-44821 Kefar Sava, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
Two topotecan treatment schedules in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer were evaluated. Protocol A (21 days) was 1.5 mg/m(2)/day topotecan on days 1 through 5 of a 21-day cycle; Protocol B (weekly) 4 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Efficacy was determined by clinical exam, CT scan, and CA125 levels. Forty-three patients on Protocol A and 21 on Protocol B were evaluated. As second-line treatment, Protocol A response was 9/20 (45%). Response to Protocol B was 4/17 (23.5%; NS). As third line or more, the response on Protocols A and B together was only 3/27 (11%). High-grade haematological toxicity was reported in 12/43 (27.9%) on Protocol A and 1/21 (4.8%) on Protocol B (p = 0.04). There was no difference in progression-free-intervals between schedules in second-line treatment. The weekly protocol had lower severe haematological toxicity. Clinical response in third line or more was very low.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2018, ANTI-CANCER DRUG, DOI [DOI 10.3322/caac.20115, DOI 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000617]