A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants

被引:129
作者
Hashim, Dena [1 ]
Cionca, Norbert [1 ]
Courvoisier, Delphine S. [2 ]
Mombelli, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Sch Dent Med, Div Periodontol, Rue Barthelemy Menn 19, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Zirconia; Dental implants; Systematic review; Survival; HARD-TISSUE RESPONSE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; SINGLE-TOOTH; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; ORAL IMPLANTS; FOLLOW-UP; CERAMIC IMPLANTS; IMMEDIATE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; MAXILLA;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-016-1853-9
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical success and survival rates of zirconia ceramic implants after at least 1 year of function and to assess if there is sufficient evidence to justify using them as alternatives to titanium implants. An electronic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) databases was performed in April 2015 by two independent examiners to retrieve clinical studies focusing on the survival rate of zirconia implants after at least 1 year of function. Implant survival was estimated using the overall proportion reported in the studies with a Clopper-Pearson 95 % confidence interval (random effect model with a Der-Simonian Laird estimate). Fourteen articles were selected out of the 1519 titles initially screened. The overall survival rate of zirconia one- and two-piece implants was calculated at 92 % (95 % CI 87-95) after 1 year of function. The survival of implants at 1 year for the selected studies revealed considerable heterogeneity. In spite of the unavailability of sufficient long-term evidence to justify using zirconia oral implants, zirconia ceramics could potentially be the alternative to titanium for a non-metallic implant solution. However, further clinical studies are required to establish long-term results, and to determine the risk of technical and biological complications. Additional randomized controlled clinical trials examining two-piece zirconia implant systems are also required to assess their survival and success rates in comparison with titanium as well as one-piece zirconia implants. Zirconia implants provide a potential alternative to titanium ones. However, clinicians must be aware of the lack of knowledge regarding long-term outcomes and specific reasons for failure.
引用
收藏
页码:1403 / 1417
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review [J].
Andreiotelli, Marina ;
Wenz, Hans J. ;
Kohal, Ralf-Joachim .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 :32-47
[2]  
Arnetzl G V, 2010, Int J Comput Dent, V13, P27
[3]  
Assal Patrick A, 2013, Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, V123, P644
[4]  
Aydin C, 2013, J PROSTHET DENT, V109, P70, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)00027-9
[5]  
Blaschke C, 2006, NEUROENDOCRINOL LETT, V27, P69
[6]  
Borgonovo A, 2011, Minerva Stomatol, V60, P229
[7]  
Borgonovo A E, 2013, Minerva Stomatol, V62, P247
[8]  
Borgonovo A E, 2010, Minerva Stomatol, V59, P381
[9]  
Borgonovo AE, 2013, INT J ESTHET DENT, V8, P532
[10]   Evaluation of the Success Criteria for Zirconia Dental Implants: A Four-Year Clinical and Radiological Study [J].
Borgonovo, Andrea Enrico ;
Censi, Rachele ;
Vavassori, Virna ;
Dolci, Marcello ;
Luis Calvo-Guirado, Jose ;
Delgado Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio ;
Maiorana, Carlo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2013, 2013