Cytomegalovirus Infection After Liver Transplantation Incidence, Risks, and Benefits of Prophylaxis

被引:13
作者
Weigand, K. [1 ]
Schnitzler, P. [2 ]
Schmidt, J. [3 ]
Chahoud, F. [1 ]
Gotthardt, D. [1 ]
Schemmer, P. [3 ]
Stremmel, W. [1 ]
Sauer, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Virol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; ORAL GANCICLOVIR; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; ANTIVIRAL PROPHYLAXIS; ALLOGRAFT-REJECTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CMV DISEASE; RECIPIENTS; ORGAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.04.025
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and related disease is a feared complication after liver transplantation. Antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in clinical practice guidelines depending on the CMV status of both donor and recipient as well as the individual risk profile. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 211 liver transplant recipients with respect to the incidence of CMV infection after transplantation, the influence of donor and recipient CMV status, and the effect of antiviral prophylaxis. In addition, the underlying liver disease and immunosuppressive regimen were compared with the incidence of CMV infection. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to CMV donor/recipient (D/R) profile: group A (D-/R-) 28 patients (13.3%), group B (D-/R+) 64 patients (30.3%), group C (D+/R+) 79 patients (37.4%), and group D (D+/R-) 40 patients (19.0%). Results. CMV infection was observed in 17.9%, 29.7%, 24.1%, and 22.5% of the patients, respectively, with no significant difference in infection rates between the groups. CMV infection occurred in 5 patients (17.9%) in the presumed low-risk profile (group A), despite an antiviral prophylaxis in 4 out of these 5 patients. In contrast, CMV infection occurred in only 9/40 patients (22.5%) in the presumed high-risk profile (group D). The most frequent infection rates were found in groups B and C (R+ groups). After successful treatment of CMV infection, no recurrence was detected. Underlying liver disease or immunosuppressive protocol had no influence on CMV infection. Conclusion. Approximately one fourth of patients will acquire CMV infection after liver transplantation independent of donor/recipient status. Surprisingly, antiviral prophylaxis does not seem to be sufficient to reduce this proportion of patients, either in presumed high-risk or in presumed low-risk situations.
引用
收藏
页码:2634 / 2641
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Mechanisms of action of mycophenolate mofetil in preventing acute and chronic allograft rejection [J].
Allison, AC ;
Eugui, EM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (02) :S181-S190
[2]   Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation [J].
Arthurs, Supha K. ;
Eid, Albert J. ;
Pedersen, Rachel A. ;
Dierichising, Ross A. ;
Kremers, Walter K. ;
Patel, Robin ;
Razonable, Raymund R. .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 13 (12) :1703-1709
[3]   Oral valganciclovir is noninferior to intravenous ganciclovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients [J].
Asberg, A. ;
Humar, A. ;
Rollag, H. ;
Jardine, A. G. ;
Mouas, H. ;
Pescovitz, M. D. ;
Sgarabotto, D. ;
Tuncer, M. ;
Noronha, I. L. ;
Hartmann, A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (09) :2106-2113
[4]   Prophylactic oral ganciclovir compared with deferred therapy for control of cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients [J].
Brennan, DC ;
Garlock, KA ;
Singer, GG ;
Schnitzler, MA ;
Lippmann, BJ ;
Buller, RS ;
Gaudreault-Keener, M ;
Lowell, JA ;
Shenoy, S ;
Howard, TK ;
Storch, GA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (12) :1843-1846
[5]   Induction therapy by anti-thymocyte globulin (rabbit) in renal transplantation:: a 1-yr follow-up of safety and efficacy [J].
Büchler, M ;
de Ligny, BH ;
Madec, C ;
Lebranchu, Y .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 17 (06) :539-545
[6]   Impact of cytomegalovirus infection, year of transplantation, and donor age on outcomes after liver transplantation for hepatitis C [J].
Burak, KW ;
Kremers, WK ;
Batts, KP ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Rosen, CB ;
Razonable, RR ;
Paya, CV ;
Charlton, MR .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (04) :362-369
[7]   Prospective, randomized trial of the effect of antibody induction in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: Three-year results [J].
Burke, GW ;
Kaufman, DB ;
Millis, JM ;
Gaber, AO ;
Johnson, CP ;
Sutherland, DER ;
Punch, JD ;
Kahan, BD ;
Schweitzer, E ;
Langnas, A ;
Perkins, J ;
Scandling, J ;
Concepcion, W ;
Stegall, MD ;
Schulak, JA ;
Gores, PF ;
Benedetti, E ;
Danovitch, G ;
Henning, AK ;
Bartucci, MR ;
Smith, S ;
Fitzsimmons, WE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (08) :1269-1275
[8]   LONG-TERM INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS OF LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION [J].
DOMINGUEZ, EA .
SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE, 1995, 15 (02) :133-138
[9]   Steroid-free liver transplantation using rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction: Results of a prospective randomized trial [J].
Eason, JD ;
Loss, GE ;
Blazek, J ;
Nair, S ;
Mason, AL .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 7 (08) :693-697
[10]   MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION AFTER RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION [J].
FARRUGIA, E ;
SCHWAB, TR .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1992, 67 (09) :879-890