A comprehensive analysis of factors that influence interstate highway crash severity in Alabama

被引:27
作者
Adanu, Emmanuel Kofi [1 ]
Agyemang, William [2 ]
Islam, Riffat [2 ]
Jones, Steven [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Syst, Alabama Transportat Inst, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Syst, Civil Constrct & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
关键词
Interstate; crash severity; crash location; single-vehicle; multi-vehicle; DRIVER-INJURY SEVERITY; RANDOM PARAMETERS APPROACH; SINGLE-VEHICLE CRASHES; LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS; LOGIT MODEL; HETEROGENEITY; FATALITIES; AGE; FREQUENCIES; COLLISION;
D O I
10.1080/19439962.2021.1949414
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This paper identifies factors that influence the severity of interstate crash outcomes and how they vary depending on the location and manner of collision. Four separate injury severity models were developed to explore the differences and similarities in crash factors between single-and multi-vehicle crashes that occurred in rural and urban areas of the state. Random parameters multinomial logit with heterogeneity in means and variances modeling approach was used to account for unobserved heterogeneity in the crash data. The model estimation results show that some driver behavioral factors such as speeding, aggressive driving, failure to use seatbelt, and driving without a valid license were found to significantly contribute to some form of injury outcome. The influence of roadway features such as type of opposing lane separation, collision type, temporal and lighting conditions on crash outcomes were also explored. Some differences and similarities in the associations between these factors and crash injury severity based on the manner and location of crash were unraveled. These findings are expected to guide the implementation of crash countermeasures on interstates. The findings of this study further support the evidence for the analysis of subsets of crash data to unravel underlying complex relationships within factors that influence crash injury severity.
引用
收藏
页码:1552 / 1576
页数:25
相关论文
共 54 条
[2]   Latent class analysis of factors that influence weekday and weekend single-vehicle crash severities [J].
Adanu, Emmanuel Kofi ;
Hainen, Alexander ;
Jones, Steven .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2018, 113 :187-192
[3]   Multilevel analysis of the role of human factors in regional disparities in crash outcomes [J].
Adanu, Emmanuel Kofi ;
Smith, Randy ;
Powell, Lars ;
Jones, Steven .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2017, 109 :10-17
[4]   Effects of truck traffic on crash injury severity on rural highways in Wyoming using Bayesian binary logit models [J].
Ahmed, Mohamed M. ;
Franke, Rebecca ;
Ksaibati, Khaled ;
Shinstine, Debbie S. .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2018, 117 :106-113
[5]   An empirical assessment of fixed and random parameter logit models using crash- and non-crash-specific injury data [J].
Anastasopoulos, Panagiotis Ch. ;
Mannering, Fred .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2011, 43 (03) :1140-1147
[6]   MOTOR-VEHICLE CRASH FATALITIES IN THE 2ND YEAR OF 65 MPH SPEED LIMITS [J].
BAUM, HM ;
WELLS, JK ;
LUND, AK .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1990, 21 (01) :1-8
[7]   Determinants of bicyclist injury severities in bicycle-vehicle crashes: A random parameters approach with heterogeneity in means and variances [J].
Behnood, Ali ;
Mannering, Fred .
ANALYTIC METHODS IN ACCIDENT RESEARCH, 2017, 16 :35-47
[8]   Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences [J].
Bhat, CR .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2003, 37 (09) :837-855
[9]   Risky driving habits and motor vehicle driver injury [J].
Blows, S ;
Ameratunga, S ;
Ivers, RQ ;
Lo, SK ;
Norton, R .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2005, 37 (04) :619-624
[10]   Driver injury severity outcome analysis in rural interstate highway crashes: a two-level Bayesian logistic regression interpretation [J].
Chen, Cong ;
Zhang, Guohui ;
Liu, Xiaoyue Cathy ;
Ci, Yusheng ;
Huang, Helai ;
Ma, Jianming ;
Chen, Yanyan ;
Guang, Hongzhi .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2016, 97 :69-78