One-sided Versus Two-sided: A Novel Opinion Dynamics Information-Type Education-Based Hegselmann-Krause Model

The classic Hegselmann-Krause opinion dynamics model plays an important role in analyzing opinion evolution among people. However, it is not in line with the reality of interpersonal communication during the modern online social times, in which people are easy to exchange opinions with another one who agrees or disagrees with themselves on certain issues by social networks. In this paper, considering the effects of the one-sided versus two-sided presentation of a controversial issue, we improve the classic HK model and propose a novel information-type education-based Hegselmann-Krause model. In our work, we formulate rules of how agents' opinions change and carry out simulation experiments on networks with different proportions of high-educated agents. Extensive experiments on artificially generated networks show that it is more difficult for someone to reach a consensus with another one who is within a group with a higher proportion of low-educated people than with a higher proportion of high-educated people, which verify the effectiveness of the proposed model.