Household adoption and the associated impact of multiple agricultural technologies in the western hills of Nepal

被引:24
作者
Floyd, C [1 ]
Harding, AH [1 ]
Paudel, KC [1 ]
Rasali, DP [1 ]
Subedi, K [1 ]
Subedi, PP [1 ]
机构
[1] Lumle Agr Res Ctr, Pokhara, Nepal
关键词
technology adoption; constraints to adoption; research and extension impact; multivariate analysis; hill farming systems;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00152-X
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This paper summarises an adoption study of 15 improved technologies in agriculture, horticulture, livestock and forestry production conducted in the western hills of Nepal in 1994/ 1995. Data are analysed and interpreted using uni and multi-variate statistical methods to provide household adoption profiles and to identify important factors affecting adoption. Results are related to the findings of an extension impact study. Their implications for research and extension in hill farming systems and for conducting technology adoption and research impact studies with multiple- technologies are considered. Only 10% of households were multi-technology adopters (adopting four technologies) while 60% adopted two or less and 30% of households did not adopt any of the technologies. Across the technologies, trying a technology was the most constraining step in the adoption process with households who had not tried the technologies ranging from 25 to 70% of the sample. The level and distribution of technology adoption were significantly influenced by extension input, by ethnicity and by household food self-sufficiency. There was a positive and significant relationship between enhanced extension input to fanning households and the wider beneficial impacts perceived by these households, as a result of the adoption of the technologies. Benefits were skewed towards a small proportion of households more favoured by extension input and household resource base. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 738
页数:24
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MONITORING EVALUATIN
[2]  
BAPAT J, 1992, J RURAL DEVELOP, V11, P461
[3]  
BELBASE KP, 1992, DISS ABSTR INT A, V52, P3008
[4]  
CIMMYT, 1993, The adoption of agriculture technology: a guide for survey design
[5]  
CLINCH NL, 1993, 9324 LARC
[6]   THE STUDY OF SOCIOECONOMIC-FACTORS INFLUENCING FERTILIZER ADOPTION DECISIONS IN NIGERIA - A SURVEY OF OYO STATE FARMERS [J].
DARAMOLA, B .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1989, 20 (03) :143-151
[7]   THE ADOPTION OF AGRICULTURAL INNOVATIONS - A REVIEW [J].
FEDER, G ;
UMALI, DL .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1993, 43 (3-4) :215-239
[8]  
FLOYD CN, 1997, 971 LARC
[9]  
KARIM ASMZ, 1995, J RURAL DEVELOP, V14, P97
[10]  
KARKI BB, 1981, RES PAPER SERIES HMG, V12