Subgroup analysis of patients with localized prostate cancer treated within the Dutch-randomized dose escalation trial

被引:26
作者
Al-Mamgani, Abrahim [1 ]
Heemsbergen, Wilma D. [2 ]
Levendag, Peter C.
Lebesque, Joos V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Daniel den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radiotherapy; Randomized trial; Dose escalation; Subgroup analysis; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; RISK; IRRADIATION; THERAPY; ANTIGEN; UPDATE; STAGE; MEN; ERA;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of dose escalation within prognostic risk groups in prostate cancer. Patients and methods: Between 1997 and 2003, 664 patients with localized prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive 68- or 78-Gy of radiotherapy. Two prognostic models were examined: a risk group model (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk) and PSA-level groupings. High-risk patients with hormonal therapy (HT) were analyzed separately. Outcome variable was freedom from failure (FFF) (clinical failure or PSA nadir + 2 mu g/L). Results: In relation to the advantage of high-dose radiotherapy, intermediate-risk patients benefited most from dose escalation. However no significant heterogeneity could be demonstrated between the risk groups. For two types of PSA-level groupings: PSA < 10 and >= 10 mu g/L, and <8, 8-18 and >8 mu g/L, the test for heterogeneity was significant (p = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively). Patients with PSA 8-18 mu g/L (n = 297, HR = 0.59) derived the greatest benefit from dose escalation. No heterogeneity could be demonstrated for high-risk patients with and without HT. Conclusion: Intermediate-risk group derived the greatest benefit for dose escalation. However, from this trial no indication was found to exclude low-risk or high-risk patients from high-dose radiotherapy. Patients could be selected for high-dose radiotherapy based on PSA-level groupings: for patients with a PSA <8 mu g/L high-dose radiotherapy is probably not indicated, but should be confirmed in other randomized studies. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 96 (2010) 13-18
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   UPDATE OF DUTCH MULTICENTER DOSE-ESCALATION TRIAL OF RADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER [J].
Al-Mamgani, Abrahim ;
van Putten, Wim L. J. ;
Heemsbergen, Wilma D. ;
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. ;
Slot, Annerie ;
Dielwart, Michel F. H. ;
Incrocci, Luca ;
Lebesque, Joos V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (04) :980-988
[2]   Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial [J].
Bolla, M ;
Collette, L ;
Blank, L ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Mattelaer, J ;
Torecilla, JL ;
Pfeffer, JR ;
Cutajar, CL ;
Zurlo, A ;
Pierart, M .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9327) :103-108
[3]   Reduction of rectal dose by integration of the boost in the large-field treatment plan for prostate irradiation [J].
Bos, LJ ;
Damen, EMF ;
de Boer, RW ;
Mijnheer, BJ ;
McShan, DL ;
Fraass, BA ;
Kessler, ML ;
Lebesque, JV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (01) :254-265
[4]   Dose-response characteristics of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy [J].
Cheung, R ;
Tucker, SL ;
Lee, AK ;
De Crevoisier, R ;
Dong, L ;
Kamat, A ;
Pisters, L ;
Kuban, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (04) :993-1002
[5]   A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy [J].
Chism, DB ;
Hanlon, AL ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Feigenberg, SJ ;
Pollack, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02) :380-385
[6]  
De Melo DR, 2007, REV BRAS PARASITOL V, V16, P166
[7]   Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David P. ;
Sydes, Matthew R. ;
Graham, John D. ;
Aird, Edwin G. ;
Bottomley, David ;
Cowan, Richard A. ;
Huddart, Robert A. ;
Jose, Chakiath C. ;
Matthews, John H. L. ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Moore, A. Rollo ;
Morgan, Rachel C. ;
Russell, J. Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher D. ;
Stephens, Richard J. ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) :475-487
[8]   Long-term multi-institutional analysis of stage T1-T2 prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy in the PSA era [J].
Kuban, DA ;
Thames, HD ;
Levy, LB ;
Horwitz, EM ;
Kupelian, PA ;
Martinez, AA ;
Michalski, JM ;
Pisansky, TM ;
Sandler, HM ;
Shipley, WU ;
Zelefsky, MJ ;
Zietman, AL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (04) :915-928
[9]   Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer [J].
Kuban, Deborah A. ;
Tucker, Susan L. ;
Dong, Lei ;
Starkschall, George ;
Huang, Eugene E. ;
Cheung, M. Rex ;
Lee, Andrew K. ;
Pollack, Alan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (01) :67-74
[10]   THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE AND GLEASON SCORE TO PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
PARTIN, AW ;
YOO, J ;
CARTER, HB ;
PEARSON, JD ;
CHAN, DW ;
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (01) :110-114