Top-Down Civic Projects Are Not Grassroots Associations: How The Differences Matter in Everyday Life

被引:43
作者
Eliasoph, Nina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Dept Sociol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
来源
VOLUNTAS | 2009年 / 20卷 / 03期
关键词
Participatory democracy; Civic associations; Hybrid governance; Empowerment; Volunteering; United States;
D O I
10.1007/s11266-009-9087-y
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Research on civic associations blurs an important distinction between the unfunded, informal, ongoing associations that theorists like de Tocqueville described versus current participatory democracy projects that are funded by the state and large nongovernmental organizations, are open to all, and are usually short-term. Based on a long-term ethnography of youth programs in the United States, this paper shows that entities like these, which participants and researchers alike often called "volunteer'' or "civic'' groups, operate very differently from traditional civic groups. The ethnography systematically details prevalent tensions that actors face when they try to cultivate the civic spirit in these increasingly typical organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 308
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Addams Jane., DEMOCRACY SOCIAL ETH
[2]  
[Anonymous], POLITIX
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, JUSTIFICATION EC GRA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, INVENTING NONPROFIT
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U LIBRE BRUXE
[6]  
[Anonymous], WHOSE KEEPER
[7]  
[Anonymous], SOUCI AUTRES ETHIQUE
[8]  
[Anonymous], ADOLESCENCES MEDITER
[9]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U PARIS 5
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, The Civic Sphere