Applicability of pushover methods for the seismic analysis of single-column bent viaducts

被引:32
作者
Isakovic, Tatjana [1 ]
Nino Lazaro, Mauro Pompeyo [2 ]
Fischinger, Matej [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Civil & Geodet Engn, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
关键词
pushover analysis; single column bent viaducts; simplified seismic analysis; nonlinear analysis; applicability of pushover analysis;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.813
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
An overview of the applicability of a typical single-mode pushover method (the N2 method) and two typical multi-mode pushover methods (the modal pushover analysis (MPA) and incremental response spectrum analysis (IRSA) methods) for the analysis of single column bent viaducts in the transverse direction is presented. Previous research, which was limited to relatively short viaducts supported by few columns, has been extended to longer viaducts with more bents. The single-mode N2 method is accurate enough for bridges where the effective modal mass of the fundamental mode is at least 80% of the total mass. The applicability of this method depends on (a) the ratio of the stiffness of the superstructure to that of the bents and (b) the strength of the bents. In short bridges with few columns, the accuracy of the N2 method increases as the seismic intensity increases, whereas in long viaducts (e.g. viaducts with lengths greater than 500m) the method is in general less effective. In the case of the analyzed moderately irregular long viaducts, which are common in construction design practice, the MPA method performed well. For the analysis of bridges where the modes change significantly, depending on the seismic intensity, the IRSA method is in principle more appropriate, unless a viaduct is torsionally sensitive. In such cases, all simplified methods should be used with care. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1202
页数:18
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Aydinoglu MN, 2007, ECCOMAS THEM C COMP
[2]  
Aydnolu M. N., 2004, P INT WORKSH PERF BA, P345
[3]  
CEN, 2004, EC81 CEN
[4]  
*CEN, 2004, EC82 CEN
[5]   A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings [J].
Chopra, AK ;
Goel, RK .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (03) :561-582
[6]   Evaluation of Modal and FEMA Pushover Analyses: SAC buildings [J].
Goel, RK ;
Chopra, AK .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2004, 20 (01) :225-254
[7]   Higher modes in simplified inelastic seismic analysis of single column bent viaducts [J].
Isakovic, T ;
Fischinger, M .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2006, 35 (01) :95-114
[8]  
Isakovic T, 2003, P I CIVIL ENG-STR B, V156, P165
[9]  
ISAKOVIC T, 2005, 4 EUR WORKSH SEISM B, P16
[10]  
Kappos A., 2004, P INT C COMP EXP ENG