A clean innovation comparison between carbon tax and cap-and-trade system

被引:96
作者
Chen, You-hua [1 ]
Wang, Chan [2 ]
Nie, Pu-yan [2 ]
Chen, Zi-rui [3 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ Guangzhou, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510420, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ GDUFE, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Sci Finance & Ind, Sch Finance, Inst Guangdong Econ & Social Dev, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Acad Social Sci, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
关键词
Cap-and-trade system; Carbon tax; Innovation investment; Emission reduction; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EMISSIONS; POLICY; TECHNOLOGY; REDUCTION; SUBSIDIES; SCHEME; FIRMS; POWER; ETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.esr.2020.100483
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Both carbon tax and cap-and-trade systems are widely applied to reduce emission. This article compares the clean innovation effects of carbon tax with cap-and-trade systems by a static optimal model. Firstly, both cap-and-trade system and carbon tax stimulates clean innovation and reduce emission. Secondly, cap-and-trade system is more efficient to reduce emission and to promote clean innovation than carbon tax. Finally, firms undertake a loss under carbon tax, while the effects of cap-and-trade system on firms' profits are uncertain, which depends on the carbon cap. In summary, this article supports cap-and-trade system to cope with global climate change, but the regulator should choose the suitable emission cap and carbon trading price to guarantee the efficiency of cap-and-trade system. So, different purposes match with different carbon emission tax policies.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Transition to Clean Technology [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Hanley, Douglas ;
Kerr, William .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (01) :52-104
[2]   Heterogeneous firms and the environment: a cap-and-trade program [J].
Anoulies, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 84 :84-101
[3]   Carbon tax or emissions trading? An analysis of economic and political feasibility of policy mechanisms for greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the Mexican power sector [J].
Barragan-Beaud, Camila ;
Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia ;
Xylia, Maria ;
Syri, Sanna ;
Silveira, Semida .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 122 :287-299
[4]   Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry [J].
Borghesi, Simone ;
Cainelli, Giulio ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :669-683
[5]   China's emissions trading system and an ETS-carbon tax hybrid [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Ho, Mun S. ;
Jorgenson, Dale W. ;
Nielsen, Chris P. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :741-753
[6]   THE LIMITATIONS OF PIGOUVIAN TAXES AS A LONG-RUN REMEDY FOR EXTERNALITIES [J].
CARLTON, DW ;
LOURY, GC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1980, 95 (03) :559-566
[7]   Emission regulation of conventional energy-intensive industries [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Wang, Chan ;
Nie, Pu-yan .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (04) :3723-3737
[8]   Subsidies under uncertainty: Modeling of input- and output-oriented policies [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Chen, Mei-xia ;
Mishra, Ashok K. .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2020, 85 :39-56
[9]   Effects of corporate social responsibility considering emission restrictions [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Nie, Pu-yan ;
Wang, Chan ;
Meng, Yan .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2019, 24 :121-131
[10]   Agricultural pollution and regulation: How to subsidize agriculture? [J].
Chen, You-hua ;
Wen, Xiao-wei ;
Wang, Bo ;
Nie, Pu-yan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 :258-264