共 42 条
A clean innovation comparison between carbon tax and cap-and-trade system
被引:96
作者:
Chen, You-hua
[1
]
Wang, Chan
[2
]
Nie, Pu-yan
[2
]
Chen, Zi-rui
[3
]
机构:
[1] South China Agr Univ Guangzhou, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510420, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ GDUFE, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Sci Finance & Ind, Sch Finance, Inst Guangdong Econ & Social Dev, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Acad Social Sci, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
关键词:
Cap-and-trade system;
Carbon tax;
Innovation investment;
Emission reduction;
ENERGY EFFICIENCY;
EMISSIONS;
POLICY;
TECHNOLOGY;
REDUCTION;
SUBSIDIES;
SCHEME;
FIRMS;
POWER;
ETS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.esr.2020.100483
中图分类号:
TE [石油、天然气工业];
TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号:
0807 ;
0820 ;
摘要:
Both carbon tax and cap-and-trade systems are widely applied to reduce emission. This article compares the clean innovation effects of carbon tax with cap-and-trade systems by a static optimal model. Firstly, both cap-and-trade system and carbon tax stimulates clean innovation and reduce emission. Secondly, cap-and-trade system is more efficient to reduce emission and to promote clean innovation than carbon tax. Finally, firms undertake a loss under carbon tax, while the effects of cap-and-trade system on firms' profits are uncertain, which depends on the carbon cap. In summary, this article supports cap-and-trade system to cope with global climate change, but the regulator should choose the suitable emission cap and carbon trading price to guarantee the efficiency of cap-and-trade system. So, different purposes match with different carbon emission tax policies.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文