Improvement of Mammographic Mass Classification Performance Using an Intelligent Data Fusion Method

被引:4
作者
Xi, Dongdong [1 ]
Li, Lihua [1 ]
Zhang, Juan [2 ]
Shan, Yanna [3 ]
Dai, Gang [2 ]
Fan, Ming [1 ]
Zheng, Bin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Coll Life Informat Sci & Instrument Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Canc Hosp, Hangzhou 310010, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Hangzhou First Peoples Hosp, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Alpha Integration; Computer-Aided Diagnosis; Fusion Method; Mammographic Mass Classification; Observer Performance Study; ROC Data Analysis; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; BREAST-CANCER; SEGMENTATION; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION; SELECTION; OBSERVER; SUPPORT; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1166/jmihi.2018.2297
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: In order to optimally apply the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes of mammograms as a "second reader" in the clinical practice, we investigated a new intelligent data fusion method to adaptively combine mammographic mass classification scores rated by individual radiologists and computed by a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme to improve classification performance. Methods: We assembled a testing dataset that involves 224 regions of interest (ROI) selected from mammograms. Half ROIs depict verified malignant masses and half involve benign masses. A CAD scheme was applied to process these ROIs and classify the masses. We also asked three observers namely a senior, a junior radiologist and a radiology resident to independently read and classify these ROIs. We then applied an alpha integration based data fusion method to adaptively combine classification scores between CAD and each observer as well as multiple observers. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method was used to analyze and compare the classification performance changes between each observer, CAD, and data fusion results. Results: The computed areas under ROC curves (AUC) and standard errors are 0.858 +/- 0.025, 0.853 +/- 0,026, 0.776 +/- 0.031 for three observers (from a senior radiologist to a radiology resident), and 0.908 +/- 0.021 for CAD, respectively. Using the alpha integration method, fusion of classification results from multiple observers or between the observer and CAD significantly improved classification performance (p < 0.05). In combining classification results of CAD and each of the three observers, the different optimal fusion weighting factors are generated, which increased AUC values by 12.1%, 10.1% and 20.9% for the three observers, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of applying a new data integration method to identify optimal weighting factors to adaptively fuse the classification scores rated by different observers and computed by CAD, which may help eventually establish a personalized scheme of single-reading plus CAD to assist radiologists in diagnosis of mammograms.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 283
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Improving the classification performance with group lasso-based ranking method in high dimensional correlated data [J].
Patil, Abhijeet R. ;
Choi, Bong-Jin ;
Kim, Sangjin .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL & COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 19 (03)
[42]   Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning and Transformer Models Using Multimodal Data for Breast Cancer Classification [J].
Hussain, Sadam ;
Ali, Mansoor ;
Naseem, Usman ;
Bosques Palomo, Beatriz Alejandra ;
Monsivais Molina, Mario Alexis ;
Garza Abdala, Jorge Alberto ;
Avendano Avalos, Daly Betzabeth ;
Cardona-Huerta, Servando ;
Gulliver, T. Aaron ;
Tamez Pena, Jose Gerardo .
CANCER PREVENTION, DETECTION, AND INTERVENTION, CAPTION 2024, 2025, 15199 :59-69
[43]   Cancer classification based on microarray gene expression data using a principal component accumulation method [J].
Liu JingJing ;
Cai WenSheng ;
Shao XueGuang .
SCIENCE CHINA-CHEMISTRY, 2011, 54 (05) :802-811
[44]   Additional Benefit of Image Fusion Method from combined High Resolution TerraSAR-X and Multispectral SPOT Data for Classification [J].
Klonus, Sascha ;
Ehlers, Manfred .
IMAGIN [E,G] EUROPE, 2010, :209-216
[45]   Fusion of HJ1B and ALOS PALSAR data for land cover classification using machine learning methods [J].
Wang, X. Y. ;
Guo, Y. G. ;
He, J. ;
Du, L. T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2016, 52 :192-203
[46]   IPL2&3 Performance Improvement Method for Process Safety Using the Event Correlation Analysis [J].
Nishiguchi, Junya ;
Takai, Tsutomu .
10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2009, 27 :1221-1226
[47]   Automated correlation and classification of secondary ion mass spectrometry images using a k-means cluster method [J].
Konicek, Andrew R. ;
Lefman, Jonathan ;
Szakal, Christopher .
ANALYST, 2012, 137 (15) :3479-3487
[48]   Fusion Approach for Remotely-Sensed Mapping of Agriculture (FARMA): A Scalable Open Source Method for Land Cover Monitoring Using Data Fusion [J].
Thomas, Nathan ;
Neigh, Christopher S. R. ;
Carroll, Mark L. ;
McCarty, Jessica L. ;
Bunting, Pete .
REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (20) :1-21
[49]   The characteristics of a "stop-flow" mode of sensor array operation using data with the best classification performance [J].
Maciejewska, M. ;
Szczurek, A. ;
Ochromowicz, L. .
SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2009, 141 (02) :417-423
[50]   Supervised cross-fusion method: a new triplet approach to fuse thermal, radar, and optical satellite data for land use classification [J].
Rangzan, Kazem ;
Kabolizadeh, Mostafa ;
Karimi, Danya ;
Zareie, Sajad .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (08)