Pricing equity default swaps under the jump-to-default extended CEV model

被引:23
作者
Mendoza-Arriaga, Rafael [1 ]
Linetsky, Vadim [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, McCombs Sch Business, Informat Risk & Operat Management Dept IROM, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, McCormick Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Default; Credit default swaps; Equity default swaps; Credit spread; Corporate bonds; Equity derivatives; Credit derivatives; CEV model; Jump-to-default extended CEV model; OPTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00780-010-0139-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Equity default swaps (EDS) are hybrid credit-equity products that provide a bridge from credit default swaps (CDS) to equity derivatives with barriers. This paper develops an analytical solution to the EDS pricing problem under the jump-to-default extended constant elasticity of variance model (JDCEV) of Carr and Linetsky. Mathematically, we obtain an analytical solution to the first passage time problem for the JDCEV diffusion process with killing. In particular, we obtain analytical results for the present values of the protection payoff at the triggering event, periodic premium payments up to the triggering event, and the interest accrued from the previous periodic premium payment up to the triggering event, and we determine arbitrage-free equity default swap rates and compare them with CDS rates. Generally, the EDS rate is strictly greater than the corresponding CDS rate. However, when the triggering barrier is set to be a low percentage of the initial stock price and the volatility of the underlying firm's stock price is moderate, the EDS and CDS rates are quite close. Given the current movement to list CDS contracts on organized derivatives exchanges to alleviate the problems with the counterparty risk and the opacity of over-the-counter CDS trading, we argue that EDS contracts with low triggering barriers may prove to be an interesting alternative to CDS contracts, offering some advantages due to the unambiguity, and transparency of the triggering event based on the observable stock price.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 540
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Modelling bonds and credit default swaps using a structural model with contagion [J].
Haworth, Helen ;
Reisinger, Christoph ;
Shaw, William .
QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2008, 8 (07) :669-680
[32]   Pricing credit default swaps with bilateral counterparty risk in a reduced form model with Markov regime switching [J].
Liang, Xue ;
Wang, Guojing ;
Li, Hong .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2014, 230 :290-302
[33]   Credit default swaps, the leverage effect, and cross-sectional predictability of equity and firm asset volatility [J].
Forte, Santiago ;
Lovreta, Lidija .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2023, 79
[34]   Asymmetric dynamics in sovereign credit default swaps pricing: evidence from emerging countries [J].
Simonyan, Serdar ;
Bayraktar, Sema .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2023, 18 (12) :5607-5629
[35]   GROWTH OPTION AND DEBT MATURITY WITH EQUITY DEFAULT SWAPS IN A REGIME-SWITCHING FRAMEWORK [J].
Luo, Pengfei ;
Yang, Zhaojun .
MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2019, 23 (06) :2250-2268
[36]   Pricing levered warrants under the CEV diffusion model [J].
Gloria, Carlos Miguel ;
Dias, Jose Carlos ;
Cruz, Aricson .
REVIEW OF DERIVATIVES RESEARCH, 2024, 27 (01) :55-84
[37]   Variance swaps pricing under the regime-switching jump-diffusion model [J].
Zou, Anqi ;
Wang, Jiajie ;
Wu, Chiye .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS, 2024, 38 (04) :549-561
[38]   EFFICIENT PRICING OF BARRIER OPTIONS AND CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS IN LEVY MODELS WITH STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATE [J].
Boyarchenko, Svetlana ;
Levendorskii, Sergei .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2017, 27 (04) :1089-1123
[39]   American step-up and step-down default swaps under Levy models [J].
Leung, Tim ;
Yamazaki, Kazutoshi .
QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2013, 13 (01) :137-157
[40]   An approximation formula for the price of credit default swaps under the fast-mean reversion volatility model [J].
He, Xin-Jiang ;
Chen, Wenting .
APPLICATIONS OF MATHEMATICS, 2019, 64 (03) :367-382