Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI

被引:17
作者
Girometti, Rossano [1 ]
Giannarini, Gianluca [2 ]
Panebianco, Valeria [3 ]
Maresca, Silvio [1 ]
Cereser, Lorenzo [1 ]
De Martino, Maria [4 ]
Pizzolitto, Stefano [5 ]
Pecoraro, Martina [3 ]
Ficarra, Vincenzo [6 ]
Zuiani, Chiara [1 ]
Valotto, Claudio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Santa Maria DellaMisericordia Univ Hosp, Inst Radiol, Dept Med, Udine, Italy
[2] Santa Maria della Misericordia Univ Hosp, Urol Unit, Udine, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Udine, Dept Med, Div Med Stat, Udine, Italy
[5] Santa Maria della Misericordia Univ Hosp, Pathol Unit, Udine, Italy
[6] Univ Messina, Dept Human & Paediat Pathol Gaetano Barresi, Urol Sect, Messina, Italy
关键词
DUTASTERIDE; PERFORMANCE; CANCER; MEN;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20210886
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the effect of different PSA density (PSAD) thresholds on the accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) of the Prostate Imaging Reporting And Data System v.2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1). Methods: We retrospectively included 123 biopsy-naive men who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal mpMRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy between April 2019 and October 2020. mpMRI, obtained on a 3.0T magnet with a PI-RADSv2.1-compliant protocol, was read by two radiologists (>1500/>500 mpMRI examinations). csPCa was defined as International Society of Urogenital Pathology grading group >= 2. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate per-index lesion sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of PI-RADSv.2.1 categories after adjusting for PSAD >= 0.10,>= 0.15, and >= 0.20 ng/mL ml(-1). Per-adjusted category cancer detection rate (CDR) was calculated, and decision analysis performed to compare PSAD-adjusted PI-RADSv.2.1 categories as a biopsy trigger. Results: csPCa prevalence was 43.9%. PSAD-adjustment increased the CDR of PI--RADSv2.1 category 4. Sensitivity/specificity/AUC were 92.6%/53.6%/0.82 for unadjusted PI-RADS, and 85.2%/72.4%/0.84, 62.9%/85.5%/0.83, and 92.4%/53.6%/0.82 when adjusting PI-RADS categories for a 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 ng/ml ml(-1) PSAD threshold, respectively. Triggering biopsy for PI-RADS four lesions and PSAD >= 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) was the strategy with greatest net benefit at 30 and 40% risk probability (0.307 and 0.271, respectively). Conclusions: PI-RADSv2.1 category four with PSAD >= 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) was the biopsy-triggering cut-off with the highest net benefit in the range of expected prevalence for csPCa. Advances in knowledge: 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) is the PSAD threshold with higher clinical utility in stratifying the risk for prostate cancer of PI-RADSv.2.1 categories.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study [J].
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Renard-Penna, Raphaele ;
Claudon, Michel ;
Roy, Catherine ;
Mege-Lechevallier, Florence ;
Decaussin-Petrucci, Myriam ;
Dubreuil-Chambardel, Marine ;
Magaud, Laurent ;
Remontet, Laurent ;
Ruffion, Alain ;
Colombel, Marc ;
Crouzet, Sebastien ;
Schott, Anne-Marie ;
Lemaitre, Laurent ;
Rabilloud, Muriel ;
Grenier, Nicolas .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01) :100-109
[22]   Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Sathianathen, Niranjan J. ;
Omer, Altan ;
Harriss, Eli ;
Davies, Lucy ;
Kasivisvanathan, Veeru ;
Punwani, Shonit ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Kastner, Christof ;
Barrett, Tristan ;
Van Den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Eddy, Ben A. ;
Gleeson, Fergus ;
Macpherson, Ruth ;
Bryant, Richard J. ;
Catto, James W. F. ;
Murphy, Declan G. ;
Hamdy, Freddie C. ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Lamb, Alastair D. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (03) :402-414
[23]   PI-RADS Committee Position on MRI Without Contrast Medium in Biopsy-Naive Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer: Narrative Review [J].
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Bittencourt, Leonardo K. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Oto, Aytekin ;
Panebianco, Valeria ;
Siddiqui, Mohummad M. ;
Tempany, Clare ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Villeirs, Geert M. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Padhani, Anwar R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (01) :3-19
[24]   Risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density for enhanced biopsy avoidance in first prostate cancer diagnostic evaluation [J].
Schoots, Ivo G. ;
Padhani, Anwar R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 127 (02) :175-178
[25]   MRI in early prostate cancer detection: how to manage indeterminate or equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions? [J].
Schoots, Ivo G. .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) :70-+
[26]   A note on Youden's J and its cost ratio [J].
Smits, Niels .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
[27]   Clinical utility of PSAD combined with PI-RADS category for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer [J].
Stevens, Erica ;
Truong, Mathew ;
Bullen, Jennifer A. ;
Ward, Ryan D. ;
Purysko, Andrei S. ;
Klein, Eric A. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (11) :846.e9-846.e16
[28]   Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures [J].
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Cook, Nancy R. ;
Gerds, Thomas ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Obuchowski, Nancy ;
Pencina, Michael J. ;
Kattan, Michael W. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) :128-138
[29]   In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer [J].
Tan, Nelly ;
Lin, Wei-Chan ;
Khoshnoodi, Pooria ;
Asvadi, Nazanin H. ;
Yoshida, Jeffrey ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Lu, David S. K. ;
Wu, Holden ;
Sung, Kyung Hyun ;
Lu, David Y. ;
Huang, Jaioti ;
Raman, Steven S. .
RADIOLOGY, 2017, 283 (01) :130-139
[30]   Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 [J].
Turkbey, Baris ;
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Margolis, Daniel J. ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Barentsz, Jelle ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (03) :340-351