Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI

被引:15
作者
Girometti, Rossano [1 ]
Giannarini, Gianluca [2 ]
Panebianco, Valeria [3 ]
Maresca, Silvio [1 ]
Cereser, Lorenzo [1 ]
De Martino, Maria [4 ]
Pizzolitto, Stefano [5 ]
Pecoraro, Martina [3 ]
Ficarra, Vincenzo [6 ]
Zuiani, Chiara [1 ]
Valotto, Claudio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Santa Maria DellaMisericordia Univ Hosp, Inst Radiol, Dept Med, Udine, Italy
[2] Santa Maria della Misericordia Univ Hosp, Urol Unit, Udine, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Udine, Dept Med, Div Med Stat, Udine, Italy
[5] Santa Maria della Misericordia Univ Hosp, Pathol Unit, Udine, Italy
[6] Univ Messina, Dept Human & Paediat Pathol Gaetano Barresi, Urol Sect, Messina, Italy
关键词
DUTASTERIDE; PERFORMANCE; CANCER; MEN;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20210886
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the effect of different PSA density (PSAD) thresholds on the accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) of the Prostate Imaging Reporting And Data System v.2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1). Methods: We retrospectively included 123 biopsy-naive men who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal mpMRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy between April 2019 and October 2020. mpMRI, obtained on a 3.0T magnet with a PI-RADSv2.1-compliant protocol, was read by two radiologists (>1500/>500 mpMRI examinations). csPCa was defined as International Society of Urogenital Pathology grading group >= 2. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate per-index lesion sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of PI-RADSv.2.1 categories after adjusting for PSAD >= 0.10,>= 0.15, and >= 0.20 ng/mL ml(-1). Per-adjusted category cancer detection rate (CDR) was calculated, and decision analysis performed to compare PSAD-adjusted PI-RADSv.2.1 categories as a biopsy trigger. Results: csPCa prevalence was 43.9%. PSAD-adjustment increased the CDR of PI--RADSv2.1 category 4. Sensitivity/specificity/AUC were 92.6%/53.6%/0.82 for unadjusted PI-RADS, and 85.2%/72.4%/0.84, 62.9%/85.5%/0.83, and 92.4%/53.6%/0.82 when adjusting PI-RADS categories for a 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 ng/ml ml(-1) PSAD threshold, respectively. Triggering biopsy for PI-RADS four lesions and PSAD >= 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) was the strategy with greatest net benefit at 30 and 40% risk probability (0.307 and 0.271, respectively). Conclusions: PI-RADSv2.1 category four with PSAD >= 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) was the biopsy-triggering cut-off with the highest net benefit in the range of expected prevalence for csPCa. Advances in knowledge: 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) is the PSAD threshold with higher clinical utility in stratifying the risk for prostate cancer of PI-RADSv.2.1 categories.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Puech, Philippe
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Claudon, Michel
    Roy, Catherine
    Mege-Lechevallier, Florence
    Decaussin-Petrucci, Myriam
    Dubreuil-Chambardel, Marine
    Magaud, Laurent
    Remontet, Laurent
    Ruffion, Alain
    Colombel, Marc
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Schott, Anne-Marie
    Lemaitre, Laurent
    Rabilloud, Muriel
    Grenier, Nicolas
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01) : 100 - 109
  • [22] Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sathianathen, Niranjan J.
    Omer, Altan
    Harriss, Eli
    Davies, Lucy
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Punwani, Shonit
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Kastner, Christof
    Barrett, Tristan
    Van Den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Eddy, Ben A.
    Gleeson, Fergus
    Macpherson, Ruth
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Catto, James W. F.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Lamb, Alastair D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (03) : 402 - 414
  • [23] PI-RADS Committee Position on MRI Without Contrast Medium in Biopsy-Naive Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer: Narrative Review
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Bittencourt, Leonardo K.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Oto, Aytekin
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Siddiqui, Mohummad M.
    Tempany, Clare
    Turkbey, Baris
    Villeirs, Geert M.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (01) : 3 - 19
  • [24] Risk-adapted biopsy decision based on prostate magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density for enhanced biopsy avoidance in first prostate cancer diagnostic evaluation
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 127 (02) : 175 - 178
  • [25] MRI in early prostate cancer detection: how to manage indeterminate or equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions?
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) : 70 - +
  • [26] A note on Youden's J and its cost ratio
    Smits, Niels
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
  • [27] Clinical utility of PSAD combined with PI-RADS category for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Stevens, Erica
    Truong, Mathew
    Bullen, Jennifer A.
    Ward, Ryan D.
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (11) : 846.e9 - 846.e16
  • [28] Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models A Framework for Traditional and Novel Measures
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Cook, Nancy R.
    Gerds, Thomas
    Gonen, Mithat
    Obuchowski, Nancy
    Pencina, Michael J.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) : 128 - 138
  • [29] In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Tan, Nelly
    Lin, Wei-Chan
    Khoshnoodi, Pooria
    Asvadi, Nazanin H.
    Yoshida, Jeffrey
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Lu, David S. K.
    Wu, Holden
    Sung, Kyung Hyun
    Lu, David Y.
    Huang, Jaioti
    Raman, Steven S.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 283 (01) : 130 - 139
  • [30] Turkbey B, 2019, EUR UROL, V76, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033