Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI

被引:17
作者
Girometti, Rossano [1 ]
Giannarini, Gianluca [2 ]
Panebianco, Valeria [3 ]
Maresca, Silvio [1 ]
Cereser, Lorenzo [1 ]
De Martino, Maria [4 ]
Pizzolitto, Stefano [5 ]
Pecoraro, Martina [3 ]
Ficarra, Vincenzo [6 ]
Zuiani, Chiara [1 ]
Valotto, Claudio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Udine, Santa Maria DellaMisericordia Univ Hosp, Inst Radiol, Dept Med, Udine, Italy
[2] Santa Maria della Misericordia Univ Hosp, Urol Unit, Udine, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Radiol Sci Oncol & Pathol, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Udine, Dept Med, Div Med Stat, Udine, Italy
[5] Santa Maria della Misericordia Univ Hosp, Pathol Unit, Udine, Italy
[6] Univ Messina, Dept Human & Paediat Pathol Gaetano Barresi, Urol Sect, Messina, Italy
关键词
DUTASTERIDE; PERFORMANCE; CANCER; MEN;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20210886
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the effect of different PSA density (PSAD) thresholds on the accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) of the Prostate Imaging Reporting And Data System v.2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1). Methods: We retrospectively included 123 biopsy-naive men who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal mpMRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy between April 2019 and October 2020. mpMRI, obtained on a 3.0T magnet with a PI-RADSv2.1-compliant protocol, was read by two radiologists (>1500/>500 mpMRI examinations). csPCa was defined as International Society of Urogenital Pathology grading group >= 2. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate per-index lesion sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of PI-RADSv.2.1 categories after adjusting for PSAD >= 0.10,>= 0.15, and >= 0.20 ng/mL ml(-1). Per-adjusted category cancer detection rate (CDR) was calculated, and decision analysis performed to compare PSAD-adjusted PI-RADSv.2.1 categories as a biopsy trigger. Results: csPCa prevalence was 43.9%. PSAD-adjustment increased the CDR of PI--RADSv2.1 category 4. Sensitivity/specificity/AUC were 92.6%/53.6%/0.82 for unadjusted PI-RADS, and 85.2%/72.4%/0.84, 62.9%/85.5%/0.83, and 92.4%/53.6%/0.82 when adjusting PI-RADS categories for a 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 ng/ml ml(-1) PSAD threshold, respectively. Triggering biopsy for PI-RADS four lesions and PSAD >= 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) was the strategy with greatest net benefit at 30 and 40% risk probability (0.307 and 0.271, respectively). Conclusions: PI-RADSv2.1 category four with PSAD >= 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) was the biopsy-triggering cut-off with the highest net benefit in the range of expected prevalence for csPCa. Advances in knowledge: 0.10 ng/mL ml(-1) is the PSAD threshold with higher clinical utility in stratifying the risk for prostate cancer of PI-RADSv.2.1 categories.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores [J].
Barkovich, Emil Jernstedt ;
Shankar, Prasad R. ;
Westphalen, Antonio C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (04) :847-854
[2]   Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naive Men [J].
Boesen, Lars ;
Norgaard, Nis ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Balslev, Ingegerd ;
Bisbjerg, Rasmus ;
Thestrup, Karen-Cecilie ;
Jakobsen, Henrik ;
Thomsen, Henrik S. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (03) :311-319
[3]   Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study [J].
Boesen, Lars ;
Norgaard, Nis ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Balslev, Ingegerd ;
Bisbjerg, Rasmus ;
Thestrup, Karen-Cecilie ;
Winther, Mads D. ;
Jakobsen, Henrik ;
Thomsen, Henrik S. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (02)
[4]   Which measurement method should be used for prostate volume for PI-RADS? A comparison of ellipsoid and segmentation methods [J].
Colvin, Robert ;
Walker, David ;
Hafron, Jason ;
Seifman, Brian ;
Nandalur, Sirisha ;
Gangwish, David ;
Nandalur, Kiran R. .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 80 :454-458
[5]   Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the dual 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia [J].
Debruyne, F ;
Barkin, J ;
van Erps, P ;
Reis, M ;
Tammela, TLJ ;
Roehrborn, C .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 46 (04) :488-495
[6]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[7]   Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database [J].
Falagario, Ugo Giovanni ;
Jambor, Ivan ;
Lantz, Anna ;
Ettala, Otto ;
Stabile, Armando ;
Taimen, Pekka ;
Aronen, Hannu J. ;
Knaapila, Juha ;
Perez, Ileana Montoya ;
Gandaglia, Giorgio ;
Fossati, Nicola ;
Martini, Alberto ;
Cucchiara, Vito ;
Picker, Wolfgang ;
Haug, Erik ;
Ratnani, Parita ;
Haines, Kenneth ;
Lewis, Sara ;
Sujit, Nair ;
Selvaggio, Oscar ;
Sanguedolce, Francesca ;
Macarini, Luca ;
Cormio, Luigi ;
Nordstrom, Tobias ;
Tewari, Ash ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Bostrom, Peter J. ;
Carrieri, Giuseppe .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06) :971-979
[8]   Avoiding Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Biopsies: Negative and Positive Predictive Value of MRI According to Prostate-specific Antigen Density, 4Kscore and Risk Calculators [J].
Falagario, Ugo Giovanni ;
Martini, Alberto ;
Wajswol, Ethan ;
Treacy, Patrick-Julien ;
Ratnani, Parita ;
Jambor, Ivan ;
Anastos, Harry ;
Lewis, Sara ;
Haines, Kenneth ;
Cormio, Luigi ;
Carrieri, Giuseppe ;
Rastinehad, Ardeshir R. ;
Wiklund, Peter ;
Tewari, Ash .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05) :700-704
[9]   Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume [J].
Ghafoor, Soleen ;
Becker, Anton S. ;
Woo, Sungmin ;
Andrieu, Pamela I. Causa ;
Stocker, Daniel ;
Gangai, Natalie ;
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Vargas, Hebert Alberto .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) :1548-1556
[10]   MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial [J].
Giganti, Francesco ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Robertson, Nicola L. ;
McCartan, Neil ;
Jameson, Charles ;
Bott, Simon R. J. ;
Winkler, Mathias ;
Gambarota, Giulio ;
Whitcher, Brandon ;
Castro, Ramiro ;
Emberton, Mark ;
Allen, Clare ;
Kirkham, Alex .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (11) :4767-4774