EUS elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes: a meta-analysis

被引:81
作者
Xu, Wei [1 ]
Shi, Jian [1 ]
Zeng, Xin [1 ]
Li, Xiang [1 ]
Xie, Wei-Fen [1 ]
Guo, Jia [2 ]
Lin, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Shanghai Changzheng Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Med Univ, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surg Hosp, Dept Ultrasonog, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; LUNG-CANCER; US ELASTOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; DIAGNOSIS; BIOPSY; LYMPHADENOPATHY; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.026
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: EUS elastography is a new technique for differentiating benign and malignant lymph nodes (LNs) by describing the mechanical property of the target tissue. Objective: To assess the accuracy of EUS elastography by pooling data of existing trials. Design: Seven studies involving 368 patients with 431 LNs were included. Meta-analysis was performed. Pooling was conducted in a fixed-effect model or a random-effect model. Patients: This study involved 368 patients. Intervention: EUS elastography. Main Outcome Measurements: Meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Results: The pooled sensitivity of EUS elastography for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant LNs was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.92), and the specificity was 85% (95% CI, 0.79-0.89). The area under the curve under summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) was 0.9456. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 5.68 (95% CI, 2.86-11.28), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.10-0.21). The subgroup analysis by excluding the outliers provided a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 0.79-0.90) and a specificity of 91% (95% CI, 0.85-0.95) for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant LNs. The area under the curve under SROC was 0.9421. Limitations: A small number of studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion: EUS elastography is a promising, noninvasive method for differential diagnosis of malignant LNs and may prove to be a valuable supplemental method to EUS-guided FNA. (Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:1001-9.)
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1009
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer and its impact on surgical staging [J].
Annema, JT ;
Versteegh, MI ;
Veselic, M ;
Voigt, P ;
Rabe, KF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (33) :8357-8361
[2]   Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is useful for nodal staging in patients with pleural mesothelioma [J].
Bean, Sarah M. ;
Eloubeidi, Mohamad A. ;
Cerfolio, Robert ;
Chhieng, David C. ;
Eltoum, Isam A. .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 36 (01) :32-37
[3]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[4]   A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion [J].
Bhutani, MS ;
Hawes, RH ;
Hoffman, BJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (06) :474-479
[5]   ENDOSONOGRAPHIC FEATURES PREDICTIVE OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS [J].
CATALANO, MF ;
SIVAK, MV ;
RICE, T ;
GRAGG, LA ;
VANDAM, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (04) :442-446
[6]   The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma [J].
Chang, KJ ;
Nguyen, P ;
Erickson, RA ;
Durbin, TE ;
Katz, KD .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (05) :387-393
[7]   Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is superior to lymph node echofeatures: A prospective evaluation of mediastinal and peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy [J].
Chen, VK ;
Eloubeidi, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (04) :628-633
[8]   Cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in multiple pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Conde-Agudelo, Agustin ;
Romero, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (12) :1365-1376
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: Didactic guidelines [J].
Devillé W.L. ;
Buntinx F. ;
Bouter L.M. ;
Montori V.M. ;
De Vet H.C.W. ;
Van Der Windt D.A.W.M. ;
Bezemer P.D. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-13