Prevalence and determinants of consanguineous marriage and its types in India: evidence from the National Family Health Survey, 2015-2016

被引:25
作者
Sharma, Santosh Kumar [1 ]
Kalam, Mir Azad [2 ]
Ghosh, Saswata [3 ]
Roy, Subho [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hlth Policy, Asian Dev Res Inst, Patna, Bihar, India
[2] Univ Calcutta, Dept Anthropol, Kolkata, India
[3] Inst Dev Studies Kolkata IDSK, Kolkata, India
关键词
Consanguineous marriage types; Determinants; India; MUSLIM POPULATION; TRENDS; BEHAVIOR; STATE;
D O I
10.1017/S0021932020000383
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the present study was to estimate the prevalence and examine the determinants of consanguineous marriage types in India. Data for 156,646 ever-married women aged 15-49 years were analysed from the National Family Health Survey (NI-HS)-4 conducted in 2015 16. The overall prevalence of consanguineous marriage was 9.9%; the South region (23%) and North-East region (3.1%) showed the highest and lowest prevalences, respectively. Muslims had a higher prevalence (15%) than Hindus (9%). The prevalence of first cousin marriage (8.7%) was more than that of second cousin (0.7%) and of uncle niece marriages (0.6%). Women living in urban areas and in nuclear families, having a higher level of education and belonging to affluent families were less likely to marry their cousins (p < 0.01). Women living in the South region of the country were more likely to marry their cousins, as well as uncles (p <9.091). Close scrutiny of the trends in the results (odds ratios) revealed no clear relationship between socioeconomic condition and consanguineous marriage. The study results suggest that religion and north-south regional dichotomy in culture largely determine consanguineous marriage rather than socioeconomic condition in India.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 576
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Consanguineous marriages in the United Arab Emirates
    AlGazali, LI
    Bener, A
    Abdulrazzaq, YM
    Micallef, R
    AlKhayat, AI
    Gaber, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOSOCIAL SCIENCE, 1997, 29 (04) : 491 - 497
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, Energy Statistics
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, CONSANGUINITY CONTEX, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139015844
  • [5] Armstrong Karen., 1991, Muhammad: A Western Attempt to Understand Islam
  • [6] CONSANGUINITY TRENDS AND CORRELATES IN THE PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES
    Assaf, Shireen
    Khawaja, Marwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOSOCIAL SCIENCE, 2009, 41 (01) : 107 - 124
  • [7] Banerjee Sushanta K., 2002, Asia-Pacific Population Journal, V17, P17
  • [8] CONSANGUINITY IN LEBANON: PREVALENCE, DISTRIBUTION AND DETERMINANTS
    Barbour, Bernadette
    Salameh, Pascale
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOSOCIAL SCIENCE, 2009, 41 (04) : 505 - 517
  • [9] Consanguineous unions and child health in the State of Qatar
    Bener, Abdulbari
    Hussain, Rafat
    [J]. PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 20 (05) : 372 - 378
  • [10] Bhagat R. B., 2017, UN EXP GROUP M SUST