Economic incentives modify agricultural impacts of nuclear war

被引:4
作者
Hochman, Gal [1 ]
Zhang, Hainan [1 ]
Xia, Lili [1 ]
Robock, Alan [1 ]
Saketh, Aleti [1 ,2 ]
van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique Y. [3 ]
Jagermeyr, Jonas [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
[3] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[5] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY USA
[6] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
climate models; crop models; computable general equilibrium model; Envisage; partial equilibrium; nuclear war; nuclear winter; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ac61c7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A nuclear war using less than 1% of the current global nuclear arsenal, which would inject 5 Tg of soot into the stratosphere, could produce climate change unprecedented in recorded human history and significant impacts on agricultural productivity and the economy. These effects would be most severe for the first five years after the nuclear war and may last for more than a decade. This paper calculates how food availability would change by employing the Environmental Impact and Sustainability Applied General Equilibrium model. Under a robust world trading system, global food availability would drop by a few percentage points. If the war would destabilize trade, it would magnify by several times the negative ramifications of land productivity shocks on food availability. If exporting countries redirect production to domestic consumption at the expense of importing countries, it would lead to the destabilization of international trade. The analysis suggests that economic models aiming to inform policymakers require both economic behavior analysis and biophysical drivers. Policy lessons derived from a crop model can be significantly nuanced when coupled with economic feedback derived from economic models. Through the impact on yield, farmers could shift production among crops and reallocate land use to maximize profits, showing the importance of general equilibrium effects such as product and input substitution and international trade. Although the global impact on corn and soybean production would be significant when just considering crop production, it could be considerably smaller under the economic model. However, this would be at the expense of other sectors, including livestock. In addition, the costs borne from disruptions to climate would vary significantly across regions, with significant adverse effects in high latitude regions. The severity of the shocks in the high-latitude areas would marginalize the farmers' product and input substitution ability.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Food Insecurity and Terrorism
    Adelaja, Adesoji
    George, Justin
    Miyahara, Takashi
    Penar, Eva
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2019, 41 (03) : 475 - 497
  • [2] Effects of conflict on agriculture: Evidence from the Boko Haram insurgency
    Adelaja, Adesoji
    George, Justin
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 117 : 184 - 195
  • [3] Baldos UL., 2017, 5424 GTAP
  • [4] Reducing unwanted consequences of aggregation in large-scale economic models - A systematic empirical evaluation with the GTAP model
    Britz, Wolfgang
    van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2016, 59 : 463 - 472
  • [5] Carter C., 2012, EFFECT US ETHA UNPUB
  • [6] Nuclear Winter Responses to Nuclear War Between the United States and Russia in the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model Version 4 and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE
    Coupe, Joshua
    Bardeen, Charles G.
    Robock, Alan
    Toon, Owen B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2019, 124 (15) : 8522 - 8543
  • [7] The displacement effect of labour-market programs: MONASH analysis
    Dixon, Peter B.
    Rimmer, Maureen T.
    [J]. ECONOMIC RECORD, 2006, 82 : S26 - S40
  • [8] ARMED CONFLICTS AND FOOD INSECURITY: EVIDENCE FROM BOKO HARAM'S ATTACKS
    George, Justin
    Adelaja, Adesoji
    Weatherspoon, Dave
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 102 (01) : 114 - 131
  • [9] Glasstone S., 1977, Eff. Nucl. weapons, P653
  • [10] Hertel T.W., 1997, GLOBAL TRADE ANAL MO