Fit for a Bayesian: An Evaluation of PPP and DIC for Structural Equation Modeling

被引:103
作者
Cain, Meghan K. [1 ]
Zhang, Zhiyong [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
Bayesian; deviance information criteria; model fit; posterior predictive p-values; structural equation modeling; INFORMATION CRITERIA; INDEXES; SENSITIVITY; INFERENCE; SELECTION; DANGERS;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2018.1490648
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Despite its importance to structural equation modeling, model evaluation remains underdeveloped in the Bayesian SEM framework. Posterior predictive p-values (PPP) and deviance information criteria (DIC) are now available in popular software for Bayesian model evaluation, but they remain underutilized. This is largely due to the lack of recommendations for their use. To address this problem, PPP and DIC were evaluated in a series of Monte Carlo simulation studies. The results show that both PPP and DIC are influenced by severity of model misspecification, sample size, model size, and choice of prior. The cutoffs PPP 7 work best in the conditions and models tested here to maintain low false detection rates and misspecified model selection rates, respectively. The recommendations provided in this study will help researchers evaluate their models in a Bayesian SEM analysis and set the stage for future development and evaluation of Bayesian SEM fit indices.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 50
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]   Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling: A More Flexible Representation of Substantive Theory [J].
Muthen, Bengt ;
Asparouhov, Tihomir .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2012, 17 (03) :313-335
[32]  
Muthen L.K., 2012, MPLUS USERS GUIDE VE
[33]  
Palomo J., 2007, HDB LATENT VARIABLE, P163, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-044452044-9/50011-2, 10.1016/B978-044452044-9/50011-2]
[34]   Monte Carlo Experiments: Design and Implementation [J].
Paxton, Pamela ;
Curran, Patrick J. ;
Bollen, Kenneth A. ;
Kirby, Jim ;
Chen, Feinian .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2001, 8 (02) :287-312
[35]  
Plummer M, 2006, BAYESIAN ANAL, V1, P681, DOI 10.1214/06-BA122C
[36]   Penalized loss functions for Bayesian model comparison [J].
Plummer, Martyn .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2008, 9 (03) :523-539
[37]  
Raats M. M., 1991, Food Quality and Preference, V3, P89, DOI 10.1016/0950-3293(91)90028-D
[38]  
Raftery A.E., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P163
[39]   To Bayes or not to Bayes, from whether to when: Applications of Bayesian, methodology to modeling [J].
Rupp, AA ;
Dey, DK ;
Zumbo, BD .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2004, 11 (03) :424-451
[40]   POWER OF THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS [J].
SATORRA, A ;
SARIS, WE .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1985, 50 (01) :83-90