A Human Right to Science?: Precarious Labor and Basic Rights in Science and Bioprospecting

被引:7
作者
Neimark, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Vermeylen, Saskia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Ctr Environm Law & Governance, Glasgow G1 1XQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Africa; bioprospecting; conservation; human rights; labor; Madagascar; SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; KNOWLEDGE; BENEFITS; ENJOY;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2016.1218749
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected human right, the right to benefit from science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap casual labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people's cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low-skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not limited just to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories but constitutes a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers, it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science. We explore to what extent the HRS can be used to encourage governments, civil society, and companies to provide basic labor and social rights to science. This should be of keen interest to geographers, who for the most part have limited engagement in human rights law, and has wider significance for those interested in exploitative labor and rights violations in the emerging bio- and green economy.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 182
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[21]  
Donnelly Jack., 2003, UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGH
[22]   Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? [J].
Fairhead, James ;
Leach, Melissa ;
Scoones, Ian .
JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2012, 39 (02) :237-261
[23]  
Ferguson James., 1995, ANTIPOLITICS MACHINE
[24]  
Fletcher Robert., 2010, Conservation and Society, V8, P171
[25]  
Hayden Cori., 2004, NATURE GOES PUBLIC M
[26]   The right to a green future: Human rights, environmentalism, and intergenerational justice [J].
Hiskes, RP .
HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY, 2005, 27 (04) :1346-1364
[27]   Setting up tropical biodiversity for conservation through non-damaging use: participation by parataxonomists [J].
Janzen, DH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2004, 41 (01) :181-187
[28]   Biotechnology and empire: The global power of seeds and science [J].
Jasanoff, Sheila .
OSIRIS, 2006, 21 :273-292
[29]  
Keller Eva., 2015, Beyond the Lens of Conservation: Malagasy and Swiss Imaginations of One Another, V1st
[30]  
Kumar, 2014, Law in Transition. Human Rights, Development and Transitional Justice, P127