Do external quality certifications improve firms' conduct? International evidence from manufacturing and service industries

被引:8
作者
Goel, Rajeev K. [1 ,2 ]
Nelson, Michael A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Illinois State Univ, Normal, IL 61790 USA
[2] Kiel Inst World Econ, Kiel, Germany
[3] Univ Akron, Akron, OH 44325 USA
关键词
Quality certification; Audit; R&D; Foreign technology licensing; Manufacturing industries; Service industries; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ISO-9000; CERTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; SIZE; INNOVATION; DETERMINANTS; PATENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.qref.2019.03.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Empirically adding to the structure-conduct-performance paradigm, this paper uses firm-level survey data across more than 100 countries to examine the influence of external certifications on the behavior or conduct of firms. We consider two dimensions of firms' conduct - R&D (research and development) spending and licensing of foreign technologies while accounting for a host of firm-specific factors (e.g., firms' age, ownership structure, size). The extant literature has mainly focused on the influence of certifications on firms' performance and generally considered single nations or a modest set of nations. Our results show external certification to positively affect conduct, whether conduct is measured by R&D or foreign technology licensing. The results are robust when broader external audits are considered. Manufacturing and service industries show qualitatively similar patterns, albeit the magnitudes of impacts differ. Older firms show some different attitudes towards R&D versus licensing, whereas the effects of larger size are consistently positive. Finally, firms located in the main business cities exhibit greater propensities to perform R&D and license foreign technologies, ceteris paribus. (C) 2019 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]  
Goel R. K., 1999, B ECON RES, V51, P339
[12]   Determinants of process innovation introductions: Evidence from 115 developing countries [J].
Goel, Rajeev K. ;
Nelson, Michael A. .
MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2018, 39 (05) :515-525
[13]  
GOEL RK, 1992, Q REV ECON FINANC, V32, P54
[14]  
HANSEN JA, 1992, SMALL BUS ECON, V4, P37
[15]  
JAFFE AB, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P984
[16]  
Kamien M. I., 1982, MARKET STRUCTURE INN
[17]   Schumpeter's legacy: A new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D [J].
Lee, CY ;
Sung, T .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (06) :914-931
[18]  
Lima MAM, 2000, INT J PROD ECON, V66, P143, DOI 10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00118-8
[19]   Propensity to Patent and Firm Size for Small R&D-Intensive Firms [J].
Link, Albert N. ;
Scott, John T. .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2018, 52 (04) :561-587
[20]   HONEST VERSUS MISLEADING CERTIFICATION [J].
Mahenc, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2017, 26 (02) :454-483