Dynamics of Patent Collaboration: The Case of Nanocomposite Materials

被引:0
作者
Islam, Nazrul [1 ]
Ozcan, Sercan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Sch Business, Exeter, Devon, England
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business Sch, Portsmouth, Hants, England
来源
2017 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET) | 2017年
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Nano-composite materials are reported to be the smartest materials of the century due to the property combinations that were not found in conventional composites. Since nanocomposite materials are at an early phase of their life-cycles, an exploratory analysis on collaborations between actors seem to be important towards the generation and dissemination of the required knowledge for actually benefiting from nanocomposite applications. This study analyses the actors' patent collaboration structures and dynamics, and to identify the determinants of collaboration in the sector. Through the use of tech mining method and patent data on nano-composite materials (multi-dimensional nano-composites and single dimensional nanorods), the paper examines whether such collaborations in nano-composite materials affect national systems of innovation owing to its interdisciplinary type and its dispersion across scientific fields. The results indicate that Asian organizations have a significant advantage in developing strong collaborations networks, with the active involvement of large organisations. Linear (mono-linkage) collaborations among actors in the case of multi-dimensional nano-composites were appeared to be an effective model, revealed the stronger bonds particularly in Japan, China and South Korea. Whilst in single dimensional nanorods' case, more distribute and decentralised collaborations were appeared to be most efficient model, revealed the strongest bonds among actors.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Understanding the emergence and deployment of "nano" S&T
    Bozeman, Barry
    Laredo, Philippe
    Mangematin, Vincent
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2007, 36 (06) : 807 - 812
  • [2] Inter-organisational projects in French innovation clusters: The construction of collaboration
    Calamel, Ludivine
    Defelix, Christian
    Picq, Thierry
    Retour, Didier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2012, 30 (01) : 48 - 59
  • [3] The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: a comparative analysis
    Chang, PL
    Shih, HY
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2004, 24 (07) : 529 - 539
  • [4] Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector
    Cowan, Kelly R.
    Daim, Tugrul U.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2011, 33 (3-4) : 183 - 199
  • [5] Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and New Application Opportunities
    Cury Camargo, Pedro Henrique
    Satyanarayana, Kestur Gundappa
    Wypych, Fernando
    [J]. MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS, 2009, 12 (01): : 1 - 39
  • [6] Which model of technology transfer for nanotechnology? A comparison with biotech and microelectronics
    Genet, Corine
    Errabi, Khalid
    Gauthier, Caroline
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2012, 32 (3-4) : 205 - 215
  • [7] Regional knowledge production in nanomaterials: a spatial filtering approach
    Grimpe, Christoph
    Patuelli, Roberto
    [J]. ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 46 (03) : 519 - 541
  • [8] The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals
    Guan, Jiancheng
    Zhao, Qingjun
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (07) : 1271 - 1286
  • [9] Designer nanorod synthesis
    Houlton, Andrew
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2016, 353 (6305) : 1204 - 1205
  • [10] Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs
    Kang, Kyung-Nam
    Park, Hayoung
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2012, 32 (01) : 68 - 78