Establishing Good Computer Modelling Practice (GCMP) in the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity

被引:7
作者
Judson, Philip N. [1 ]
Barber, Christopher [2 ]
Canipa, Steven J. [2 ]
Poignant, Geraldine [2 ]
Williams, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Heather Lea Cottage, Norwood HG3 1TE, Harrogate, England
[2] Lhasa Ltd, Leeds LS11 5PS, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Structure-activity relationships; Toxicology; Performance metrics; Software audit; APPLICABILITY DOMAIN;
D O I
10.1002/minf.201400137
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
This paper suggests guidelines for good computer modelling practice (GCMP) when predicting chemical toxicity, with similar purposes to those for Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). The purpose of GCMP is not to specify what should be delivered with models or predictions but to set out what must be done to ensure that work can be audited, on site, in a way analogous to the auditing of studies conforming to GLP; it is intended to confirm that work has been done properly, as distinct from providing advice on how to do it. Comments are made on the guidelines and how they might be followed, based on practical experience with the implementation of such a scheme in the development of knowledge-based and quantitative structure activity relationship models. It is hoped that publication of this paper will encourage wider discussion of the subject leading to adoption of measures to ensure the trustworthiness of computer modelling work that is carried out in connection with regulatory submissions.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 283
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, OECD ENV HLTH SAF PU, P46
[2]   CHEMICAL-STRUCTURE, SALMONELLA MUTAGENICITY AND EXTENT OF CARCINOGENICITY AS INDICATORS OF GENOTOXIC CARCINOGENESIS AMONG 222 CHEMICALS TESTED IN RODENTS BY THE UNITED-STATES NCI/NTP [J].
ASHBY, J ;
TENNANT, RW .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1988, 204 (01) :17-115
[3]   The acceptance of in silico models for REACH: Requirements, barriers, and perspectives [J].
Benfenati, Emilio ;
Diaza, Rodolfo Gonella ;
Cassano, Antonio ;
Pardoe, Simon ;
Gini, Giuseppina ;
Mays, Claire ;
Knauf, Ralf ;
Benighaus, Ludger .
CHEMISTRY CENTRAL JOURNAL, 2011, 5
[4]   QSAR Modeling: Where Have You Been? Where Are You Going To? [J].
Cherkasov, Artem ;
Muratov, Eugene N. ;
Fourches, Denis ;
Varnek, Alexandre ;
Baskin, Igor I. ;
Cronin, Mark ;
Dearden, John ;
Gramatica, Paola ;
Martin, Yvonne C. ;
Todeschini, Roberto ;
Consonni, Viviana ;
Kuz'min, Victor E. ;
Cramer, Richard ;
Benigni, Romualdo ;
Yang, Chihae ;
Rathman, James ;
Terfloth, Lothar ;
Gasteiger, Johann ;
Richard, Ann ;
Tropsha, Alexander .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 57 (12) :4977-5010
[5]   DESCRIBING THE VALIDITY OF CARCINOGEN SCREENING-TESTS [J].
COOPER, JA ;
SARACCI, R ;
COLE, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1979, 39 (01) :87-89
[6]   Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances [J].
Cronin, MTD ;
Jaworska, JS ;
Walker, JD ;
Comber, MHI ;
Watts, CD ;
Worth, AP .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 111 (10) :1391-1401
[7]  
EMA, EMACHMPICH838122013
[8]   QSAR Modeling is not "Push a Button and Find a Correlation": A Case Study of Toxicity of (Benzo-)triazoles on Algae [J].
Gramatica, Paola ;
Cassani, Stefano ;
Roy, Partha Pratim ;
Kovarich, Simona ;
Yap, Chun Wei ;
Papa, Ester .
MOLECULAR INFORMATICS, 2012, 31 (11-12) :817-835
[9]  
Gramatica Paola, 2013, Methods Mol Biol, V930, P499, DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-059-5_21
[10]   Assessing confidence in predictions made by knowledge-based systems [J].
Judson, Philip N. ;
Stalford, Susanne A. ;
Vessey, Jonathan .
TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (01) :70-79