Moderate Aortic Stenosis in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients More Than 70 Years of Age: To Replace or Not to Replace?

被引:16
作者
Dagenais, Francois [1 ]
Mathieu, Patrick [1 ]
Doyle, Daniel [1 ]
Dumont, Eric [1 ]
Voisine, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Dept Cardiac Surg, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
VALVE-REPLACEMENT; MILD; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; IMPLANTATION; REOPERATION; DISEASE; TIME; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.06.036
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Moderate aortic stenosis in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients more than 70 years old is not unusual. The risk-benefit of performing a concomitant aortic valve replacement (AVR) is often difficult to assess. To stratify the risk-benefit ratio, we reviewed outcomes of CABG patients more than 70 years old with preoperative moderate aortic stenosis (valve area 1.0 to 1.6 cm(2) or indexed valve area 0.6 to 1.0 cm(2)/m(2)). Methods. Among 263 CABG patients more than 70 years old with moderate aortic stenosis, 167 patients underwent only CABG and 96 had CABG+AVR. Results. Cross-clamp time (p < 0.0001) and perioperative transient ischemic attack-cerebrovascular accident (p < 0.04) were significantly higher in the CABG+AVR group. In-hospital mortality was comparable among groups (CABG 6.0% versus CABG+AVR 4.2%; p = 0.8). At a mean follow-up of 4.5 +/- 3.0 years, 5-year survival (CABG 64.2% +/- 4.3% versus CABG+AVR 62.3% +/- 5.5%) and freedom from AVR (CABG 97.8% +/- 1.2% versus CABG+AVR 98.9% +/- 1.1%; p = 0.13) were comparable among both groups. Among patients treated with CABG alone, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 26 mm Hg and 15 mm Hg as maximum and mean aortic valve gradients, respectively, for increased risk of reoperation for late AVR. Multivariate analyses for predictors of operative mortality were preoperative renal failure (odds ratio [ OR] 7.64, p < 0.001) and intubation more than 48 hours (OR 11.10, p < 0.0002); for late death, ejection fraction less than 40% (OR 3.35, p < 0.02), New York Heart Association functional class III or IV (OR 2.37, p < 0.002), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.26, p < 0.02), and renal failure (OR 3.03, p < 0.003); for perioperative transient ischemic attack-cerebrovascular accident, cross-clamp time (OR 1.02, p < 0.02) and Parsonnet score (OR 1.09, p < 0.05). Conclusions. For CABG patients more than 70 years old with minimal comorbidities especially in the presence of aortic gradients of 26/15 mm Hg or greater, concomitant AVR for moderate aortic stenosis should be performed during CABG and may be performed with minimal additional operative risk. Patients with significant comorbidities should be managed with CABG alone, owing to an increased perioperative risk, poor midterm survival, and minimal risk of AVR at 5 years. (Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:1495-1500) (C) 2010 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1499
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Management of mild to moderate aortic valve disease during coronary artery bypass grafting
    Ahmed, AAM
    Graham, ANJ
    Lovell, D
    O'Kane, HO
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 24 (04) : 535 - 539
  • [2] Coronary artery bypass grafting combined with aortic valve replacement in healthy octogenarians does not increase postoperative risk
    Brunvand, H
    Offstad, J
    Nitter-Hauge, S
    Svennevig, JL
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2002, 36 (05) : 297 - 301
  • [3] MANAGEMENT OF MILD AORTIC-STENOSIS DURING CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY
    COLLINS, JJ
    ARANKI, SF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 1994, 9 (02) : 145 - 147
  • [4] Management of asymptomatic mild aortic stenosis during coronary artery operations
    Fiore, AC
    Swartz, MT
    Naunheim, KS
    Moroney, DA
    Canvasser, DA
    McBride, LR
    Peigh, PS
    Kaiser, GC
    Willman, VL
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 61 (06) : 1693 - 1697
  • [5] Mortality and need for reoperation in patients with mild-to-moderate asymptomatic aortic valve disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft alone
    Hochrein, J
    Lucke, JC
    Harrison, JK
    Bashore, TM
    Wolfe, WG
    Jones, RH
    Lowe, JE
    White, WD
    Glower, DD
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1999, 138 (04) : 791 - 797
  • [6] Isolated surgical aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting with patent grafts: is this old-fashioned technique obsolete?
    Khaladj, Nawid
    Shrestha, Matakh
    Peterss, Sven
    Kutschka, Ingo
    Strueber, Martin
    Hoy, Ludwig
    Haverich, Axel
    Hagl, Christian
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 35 (02) : 260 - 264
  • [7] Transapical aortic valve implantation: is it ready for prime time?
    Mack, Michael J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 36 (02) : 229 - 230
  • [8] Aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting
    Odell, JA
    Mullany, CJ
    Schaff, HV
    Orszulak, TA
    Daly, RC
    Morris, JJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (05) : 1424 - 1430
  • [9] Management of mild aortic stenosis during coronary artery bypass surgery: An update, 1992-2001
    Phillips, BJ
    Karavas, AN
    Aranki, SF
    Cohn, LH
    Rawn, JD
    Mihaljevic, T
    Byrne, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2003, 18 (06) : 507 - 511
  • [10] Management of Mild Aortic Stenosis at the Time of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Should the Valve Be Replaced?
    Sareyyupoglu, Basar
    Sundt, Thoralf M., III
    Schaff, Hartzell V.
    Enriquez-Sarano, Maurice
    Greason, Kevin L.
    Suri, Rakesh M.
    Burkhart, Harold M.
    Park, Soon J.
    Dearani, Joseph A.
    Daly, Richard C.
    Orszulak, Thomas A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 88 (04) : 1224 - 1231