Sequential Pneumatic Compression in the Arm in Neurocritical Patients with a Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter: A Randomized Trial

被引:6
|
作者
Rabinstein, Alejandro A. [1 ]
Hellickson, Jodi D. [2 ]
Macedo, Thanila A. [3 ]
Lewis, Bradley D. [3 ]
Mandrekar, Jay [4 ]
McBane, Robert D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Nursing, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Deep venous thrombosis; Upper extremity; Intermittent pneumatic compression; Sequential compression device; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; RISK; PREVENTION; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s12028-019-00765-w
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used for parenteral access in critically ill hospitalized patients, but they increase the incidence of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UE DVT). Sequential compression devices (SCDs) applied to the legs effectively reduce lower extremity DVT, but have not been tested in the arms. Our objective was to determine whether SCDs applied to the arm may reduce the risk of PICC-associated UE DVT. Methods This was a retrospective study of randomized, single-center, controlled clinical trial on patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit with critical neurological illness who had a PICC and were not receiving anticoagulants. Between January 2014 and October 2016, patients were randomized 1:1 to an intervention group having a custom SCD applied to the arm harboring the PICC or to a control group. The primary endpoint was ultrasound-detected UE DVT. Results Following randomization of 77 subjects, the study was terminated due to excess DVT in the treatment arm. UE DVT was detected in 18 subjects (29.0%), and it was more frequent among those in the SCD group (13/31 [41.9%] vs. the control group 5/31 [16.1%]; p = 0.049). After accounting for crossovers, the difference was still significant (12/28 [43.0%] vs. 6/34 [17.6%]; p = 0.048). Yet, symptomatic UE DVT (n = 3) and pulmonary embolism without evidence of lower extremity DVT (n = 2) were only observed in patients who were not wearing the SCD on the arm. Conclusions Although UE DVT is commonly associated with PICC use, the results of this trial do not support the use of SCD on the arm for DVT prevention. Further research on this strategy may nonetheless be justified.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 192
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety of Cryopreserved Stem Cell Infusion through a Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter
    Milczarek, Slawomir
    Kulig, Piotr
    Zuchmanska, Alina
    Baumert, Bartlomiej
    Osekowska, Bogumila
    Bielikowicz, Anna
    Wilk-Milczarek, Ewa
    Machalinski, Boguslaw
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [22] Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters and Central Venous Catheters in Burn Patients: A Comparative Review
    Fearonce, Griffin
    Faraklas, Iris
    Saffle, Jeffrey R.
    Cochran, Amalia
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2010, 31 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [23] Outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter vs conventional central venous catheters in hematological cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ge, Weilei
    Zheng, Chen
    HEMATOLOGY, 2025, 30 (01)
  • [24] Peripherally inserted central catheter antibiotic therapy for cystic fibrosis patients
    Betegnie, A. -L.
    Cracowski, C.
    Bedouch, P.
    Segond, C.
    Robein-Dobremez, M. -J.
    Pin, I.
    Allenet, B.
    REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2014, 31 (09) : 822 - 830
  • [25] Increased risk of symptomatic upper-extremity venous thrombosis with multiple peripherally inserted central catheter insertions in pediatric patients
    Gnannt, Ralph
    Waespe, Nicolas
    Temple, Michael
    Amirabadi, Afsaneh
    Liu, Kuan
    Brandao, Leonardo R.
    Connolly, Bairbre L.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 48 (07) : 1013 - 1020
  • [26] Interventional management of central vein occlusion in patients with peripherally inserted central catheter placement
    Yeon, Jae Woo
    Cho, Young Kwon
    Kim, Han Myun
    Song, Myung Gyu
    Song, Soon-Young
    Cho, Sung Bum
    Lee, Sam Yeol
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2018, 6 (05) : 566 - 574
  • [27] Incidence of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Neonates Following Removal of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters
    Casner, Michael
    Hoesli, Sandra J.
    Slaughter, James C.
    Hill, Melissa
    Weitkamp, Joern-Hendrik
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [28] Does ultrasound guidance for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion reduce the incidence of tip malposition? - a randomized trial
    Oleti, Tejopratap
    Sankar, M. Jeeva
    Thukral, Anu
    Sreenivas, V
    Gupta, Arun Kumar
    Agarwal, Ramesh
    Deorari, Ashok K.
    Paul, Vinod K.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 39 (01) : 95 - 101
  • [29] A model to assess the risk of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related thrombosis in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Peng, Si-yi
    Wei, Tao
    Li, Xu-ying
    Yuan, Zhong
    Lin, Qin
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (02) : 1127 - 1137
  • [30] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Versus Central Venous Catheter: It Is Time to Use Different Approaches and Metrics for a More Useful Comparison
    Arcoverde de Sousa, Daniel
    Spessoto, Andrea Beolchi
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : E109 - E110