Growth and photosynthetic responses of the federally endangered shrub Lindera melissifolia (Lauraceae), to varied light environments

被引:110
作者
Aleric, KM [1 ]
Kirkman, LK [1 ]
机构
[1] Joseph W Jones Ecol Res Ctr, Newton, GA 39870 USA
关键词
endangered species; Lauraceae; Lindera melissifolia; morphological plasticity; optimal habitat; photosynthetic light response; pondberry; shade tolerance;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.92.4.682
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Photosynthetic, morphological, and growth responses to light environment can be useful measurements to determine favorable habitat conditions for the conservation of endangered species. For Lindera melissfolia (Walt.) Blume, we compared morphological and photosynthetic responses under natural and controlled light regimes, and growth under three light treatments: 100%, 42%, and 19% full sunlight. Typical sun-shade morphological responses to decreasing light levels included decreased stomatal density, increased specific leaf area, and increased leaf area ratio. Photosynthetic capacity (3-6 mu mol CO2 center dot m(-2) center dot s(-1)) was consistent with other shade-tolerant species. Light-saturated rates of photosynthesis of experimental plants increased with increasing light up to 42% sunlight, but declined at 100% sunlight. The 100% light treatment also resulted in lower plant biomass, primarily from a reduction in root biomass. Results indicate that canopy conditions at levels below 40% sunlight are optimal for plant growth and should be considered in management and reintroduction efforts for this species.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 689
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   COMPARATIVE ECOPHYSIOLOGY OF A RARE AND A WIDESPREAD SPECIES OF ECHINACEA (ASTERACEAE) [J].
BASKAUF, CJ ;
EICKMEIER, WG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1994, 81 (08) :958-964
[2]   Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient [J].
Beaudet, M ;
Messier, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1998, 28 (07) :1007-1015
[3]  
Bjorkman O, 1981, ENCY PLANT PHYSL A, V12A, P57
[4]   COMPARATIVE PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF SUN AND SHADE PLANTS [J].
BOARDMAN, NK .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1977, 28 :355-377
[5]   THE ROLE OF ECOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION [J].
BRUSSARD, PF .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1991, 1 (01) :6-12
[6]   EFFECTS OF LIGHT AND TEMPERATURE ON LEAF ANATOMY AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN FRAGARIA-VESCA [J].
CHABOT, BF ;
CHABOT, JF .
OECOLOGIA, 1977, 26 (04) :363-377
[7]   THE IMPORTANCE OF SUNFLECKS FOR FOREST UNDERSTORY PLANTS - PHOTOSYNTHETIC MACHINERY APPEARS ADAPTED TO BRIEF, UNPREDICTABLE PERIODS OF RADIATION [J].
CHAZDON, RL ;
PEARCY, RW .
BIOSCIENCE, 1991, 41 (11) :760-766
[8]   PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSES OF BLACK WALNUT (JUGLANS-NIGRA) TO SHADING [J].
DEAN, TJ ;
PALLARDY, SG ;
COX, GS .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1982, 12 (04) :725-730
[9]   The role of xanthophyll cycle carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis [J].
DemmigAdams, B ;
Adams, WW .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 1996, 1 (01) :21-26
[10]  
Devall M, 2001, NAT AREA J, V21, P250