Self-report measures of secure attachment in adulthood: A systematic review

被引:11
作者
Justo-Nunez, Miranda [1 ]
Morris, Lydia [1 ]
Berry, Katherine [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Div Psychol & Mental Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Greater Manchester Mental Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Complex Trauma & Resilience Res Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
adult; attachment; psychometric; secure; self-report; validity; POSITIVE-OUTCOME BIAS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; QUESTIONNAIRE; STABILITY; INTERVIEW; VALIDITY; STYLES; SCALE; PERSONALITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1002/cpp.2756
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background Secure attachment in adulthood is associated with many markers of adaptive functioning. Valid and reliable self-report measures of attachment security could provide a practical tool to help advance strengths-based research and clinical work. Previous reviews have not specifically examined the psychometric properties of self-report instruments with respect to secure attachment or systematically appraised the methodological quality of relevant validation studies. Method A systematic review was completed in accordance with the COSMIN guidelines for reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. The methodological quality of individual studies was evaluated, and results were rated against criteria for good measurement properties. Results A total of 40 studies were included in the review, which collectively reported on 24 self-report instruments. The methodological quality of individual studies was variable, and no single instrument was identified as having sufficient evidence of a range of psychometric properties. However, the Attachment Style Questionnaire-Short Form (ASQ-SF), the Cartes-Modeles Individuels de Relations (CAMIR), Cartes-Modeles Individuels de Relations-Reduced (CAMIR-R), and the Psychological Treatment Inventory-Attachment Style Scales (PTI-ASS) had the most robust evidence for the properties assessed. Conclusion Existing self-report measures assessing adult secure attachment have limited psychometric support. More methodologically robust studies of content validity, reliability, measurement invariance, and construct validity in particular are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:1812 / 1842
页数:31
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Ahmad N., 2016, INT J INDIAN PSYCHOL, V3, P48, DOI [10.25215/0304.082, DOI 10.25215/0302.090]
[2]   INFANT-MOTHER ATTACHMENT [J].
AINSWORTH, MDS .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1979, 34 (10) :932-937
[3]   AN ETHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO PERSONALITY-DEVELOPMENT [J].
AINSWORTH, MDS ;
BOWLBY, J .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (04) :333-341
[4]   Rethinking adult attachment: A study of expert consensus [J].
Allen, JG ;
Stein, H ;
Fonagy, P ;
Fultz, J ;
Target, M .
BULLETIN OF THE MENNINGER CLINIC, 2005, 69 (01) :59-80
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1985, ADULT ATTACHME UNPUB, DOI DOI 10.1037/T02879-000
[6]  
Backstrom M., 2007, Individual Difference Research, V5, P124, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9450.00216
[7]   A PSYCHOMETRIC STUDY OF THE ADULT ATTACHMENT INTERVIEW - RELIABILITY AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY [J].
BAKERMANSKRANENBURG, MJ ;
VAN IJZENDOORN, MH .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 29 (05) :870-879
[8]  
Balluerka N, 2011, PSICOTHEMA, V23, P486
[9]   Validity of scores on three attachment style scales: Exploratory and confirmatory evidence [J].
Becker, TE ;
Billings, RS ;
Eveleth, DM ;
Gilbert, NW .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1997, 57 (03) :477-493
[10]   Connecting attachment style to resilience: Contributions of self-care and self-efficacy [J].
Bender, Ansley ;
Ingram, Rick .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 130 :18-20