Decision Support Framework for Project-Level Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation through Integrating Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment

被引:20
作者
He, Song [1 ]
Salem, Ossama [2 ]
Salman, Baris [3 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Sid & Reva Dewberry Dept Civil Environm & Infrast, 2248 Nguyen Engn Bldg, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Sid & Reva Dewberry Dept Civil Environm & Infrast, 1300 Nguyen Engn Bldg, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[3] Syracuse Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 151 Link Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation; Sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost analysis; Decision support framework; What-if analysis; PERFORMANCE; OPTIMIZATION; FLOW;
D O I
10.1061/JPEODX.0000239
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Over the last decade, transportation asset management practices have been increasingly enhanced through incorporation of sustainability considerations. Organizational- and network-level guidelines have been developed to assist transportation agencies in sustainability-driven highway network prioritization, but quantifying life cycle economic, social, and environmental impacts of highway treatment activities and projects using consistent, reliable data for informed project-level decision-making remains a challenge. This paper proposes a decision support framework to identify major life cycle economic, social, and environmental impacts of highway treatment activities and projects through integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost analysis, allowing practitioners to determine the most appropriate project alternatives. Databases (e.g., RSMeans) and simulation models (e.g., Athena Pavement LCA and MOtor Vehicle Emission Simulator) were used to evaluate life cycle impacts from both the agency and user perspectives. Project alternatives using various sustainable/innovative techniques, including warm mix asphalt overlay, cold in-place recycling, full depth reclamation, intelligent compaction, and precast concrete pavement systems, were analyzed. Using the results of life cycle impacts following this framework, practitioners can better understand the implications of project-level decisions, perform what-if analysis to investigate trade-offs among alternatives, and achieve sustainability-related agency goals and objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, World happiness report 2021
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, AASHTO Transportation Asset Management Guide: A Focus on Implementation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The Value of Travel Time Savings: Departmental Guidance for Conducting Economic Evaluations
[4]  
ASCE, 2017, Infrastructure Report Card
[5]   Putting sustainability theory into roadway design practice: Implementation of LCA and LCCA analysis for pavement type selection in real world decision making [J].
Batouli, Mostafa ;
Bienvenu, Michael ;
Mostafavi, Ali .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 52 :289-302
[6]  
Blincoe L., 2010, EC SOC IMPACT MOTOR
[7]  
Bloom Eleanor F., 2016, Geo-Chicago 2016. Sustainability and Resiliency in Geotechnical Engineering. Proceedings, P693
[8]   Full-depth reclamation for the rehabilitation of local roads: a case study [J].
Bocci, Maurizio ;
Grilli, Andrea ;
Cardone, Fabrizio ;
Ferrotti, Gilda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2014, 15 (03) :191-201
[9]  
Bureau of Transportation Statistics and the US Census Bureau, 2015, TRANSP COMM FLOW SUR TRANSP COMM FLOW SUR
[10]  
Carlson T.R., 1997, DEV SPEED CORRECTION