Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a minimally invasive B-twin expandable spinal spacer

被引:34
作者
Folman, Y
Lee, TH
Silvera, JR
Gepstein, R
机构
[1] Hillel Yaffe Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, IL-38100 Hadera, Israel
[2] Meir Med Ctr, Spinal Care Unit, Kefar Sava, Israel
[3] Wooridul Spine Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Uyapar MC, Dept Neurosurg, Puerto Ordaz, Venezuela
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2003年 / 16卷 / 05期
关键词
degenerative disc disease; posterior lumbar interbody fusion; spinal spacer;
D O I
10.1097/00024720-200310000-00004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Acquired degenerative disc disease causes gradual disc space collapse, concurrent discogenic or facet-induced pain, and possible compression radiculopathy. Surgical treatment aims to re-expand the intervertebral space and stabilize the involved segment in balanced alignment until fusion is complete. The prevailing methods make use of a twin cage device of predetermined size. Their implantation requires extensive exposure, entailing the sacrifice of posterior stabilizing structures. The procedure also results in significant traction on the dural sac and the cauda equina and is thereby a potential source of neurologic damage. The new expandable spinal spacer (ESS) was designed to mitigate all the shortcomings alluded to above. A prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted of 87 patients with chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease, treated by posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using a newly designed ESS. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committees of all the participating institutions. The objective was to test the safety and efficacy of the device. Each participant was followed periodically for >1 postoperative year. The ongoing record included intraoperative difficulties and complications, if any, radiologic evidence of fusion and clinical outcome as scored by pre- and postoperative questionnaires pertaining to pain intensity and degree of disability. No dural lacerations or neurologic deficit occurred. There were no mechanical failures of the spacer. Radiologic study demonstrated fusion in all but one patient. Disc space height that averaged 7.53 +/- 2.42 mm before surgery increased to 10.03 +/- 2.00 mm at the time of surgery and stabilized at 9.47 +/- 2.10 mm upon final follow-up. Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Index decreased by 60% and 58%, respectively. PLIF using the ESS achieves the same ultimate outcome as do other methods currently in use but does not share the handicaps and hazards and is more user-friendly to the surgeon.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 460
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages: an independent review of 71 cases [J].
Agazzi, S ;
Reverdin, A ;
May, D .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 91 (02) :186-192
[2]  
ALBUMI K, 1990, SPINE, V15, P1142
[3]  
BAGBY GW, 1988, ORTHOPEDICS, V11, P931
[4]   CAN LUMBAR SPINE RADIOGRAPHS ACCURATELY DETERMINE FUSION IN POSTOPERATIVE-PATIENTS - CORRELATION OF ROUTINE RADIOGRAPHS WITH A 2ND SURGICAL LOOK AT LUMBAR FUSIONS [J].
BLUMENTHAL, SL ;
GILL, K .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (09) :1186-1189
[5]   Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system - Two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial [J].
Brantigan, JW ;
Steffee, AD ;
Lewis, ML ;
Quinn, LM ;
Persenaire, JM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1437-1446
[6]  
Briggs H, 1944, J BONE JOINT SURG, V26, P125
[7]  
CLOWARD RB, 1945, ANN M HAW TERR MED A
[8]   Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium threaded cage device [J].
Elias, WJ ;
Simmons, NE ;
Kaptain, GJ ;
Chadduck, JB ;
Whitehill, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 93 (01) :45-52
[9]  
EVANS JH, 1985, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P38
[10]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271