Personality traits and the reporting of affective disorder symptoms in depressed patients

被引:31
作者
Duberstein, Paul R.
Heisel, Marnin J.
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Lab Personal & Dev, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Psychiat & Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
[3] Lawson Hlth Res Inst, London, ON, Canada
关键词
personality; symptom-reporting; major depression; older adults;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.025
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A deeper understanding of the influences on self-reported mood symptoms could inform the debate about the utility of self-report instruments and enhance the assessment and treatment of affective disorders. We tested the hypotheses that higher Neuroticism is associated with the over-reporting of affective symptoms and lower Openness to Experience is associated with the under-reporting of affective symptoms. Methods: Subjects were 134 inpatients of ages 50 and over diagnosed with a mood disorder. Personality was assessed with the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Self-reported depression was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II; observer-rated depression was assessed via the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Symptom-reporting was defined as the ratio of self-reported to observer-rated symptoms. Results: As hypothesized, multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that high Neuroticism contributed to patients' over-reporting of mood symptoms. Contrary to the hypothesis, low Openness was associated with high ratios of self-reported to observer-rated mood symptoms. Limitations: Cross-sectional design and unclear generalizability to racial/ethnic minorities. Conclusions: Traits are important correlaters of self-reported vs. observer-rated symptoms in patients with affective disorders. To the extent that economic imperatives and other pressures impel greater reliance on self-report data in mental health research and services, there will be a corresponding need for prospective research on the determinants and clinical implications of discrepancies between self-reports and observer ratings. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Effect of the addition of a "help" question to two screening questions on specificity for diagnosis of depression in general practice: diagnostic validity study [J].
Arroll, B ;
Goodyear-Smith, F ;
Kerse, N ;
Fishman, T ;
Gunn, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521) :884-886A
[2]   COMPARISON BETWEEN HAMILTON RATING-SCALE AND BECK INVENTORY IN MEASUREMENT OF DEPRESSION [J].
BAILEY, J ;
COPPEN, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1976, 128 (MAY) :486-489
[3]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[4]  
Beck AT., 1996, MANUAL BECK DEPRESSI
[5]   A comparison of alternative assessments of depressive symptom severity: a pilot study [J].
Biggs, MM ;
Shores-Wilson, K ;
Rush, AJ ;
Carmody, TJ ;
Trivedi, MH ;
Crismon, ML ;
Toprac, MG ;
Mason, M .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2000, 95 (01) :55-65
[6]   Early and late onset depression in old age: different aetiologies, same phenomenology [J].
Brodaty, H ;
Luscombe, G ;
Parker, G ;
Wilhelm, K ;
Hickie, I ;
Austin, MP ;
Mitchell, P .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 66 (2-3) :225-236
[7]  
CARROLL BJ, 1973, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V28, P361
[8]   The validity of proxy-based data in suicide research: a study of patients 50 years of age and older who attempted suicide. 1. Psychiatric diagnoses [J].
Conner, KR ;
Duberstein, PR ;
Conwell, Y .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 104 (03) :204-209
[9]   VALIDATION OF A MEASURE OF PHYSICAL ILLNESS BURDEN AT AUTOPSY - THE CUMULATIVE ILLNESS RATING-SCALE [J].
CONWELL, Y ;
FORBES, NT ;
COX, C ;
CAINE, ED .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1993, 41 (01) :38-41
[10]   Concordance between self-report and clinician's assessment of depression [J].
Corruble, E ;
Legrand, JM ;
Zvenigorowski, H ;
Duret, C ;
Guelfi, JD .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (05) :457-465