Screen-based anesthesia simulation with debriefing improves performance in a mannequin-based anesthesia simulator

被引:69
作者
Schwid, HA
Rooke, GA
Michalowski, P
Ross, BK
机构
[1] Univ Washington, VAPSHCS, Dept Anesthesiol, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Anesthesiol, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/S15328015TLM1302_4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Previous investigations have established the need for improved training for management of anesthetic emergencies. Training with inexpensive screen-based anesthesia simulators may prove to be helpful. Purposes: The measured the effectiveness of screen-based simulator training with debriefing on the response to simulated anesthetic critical incidents. Methods: Thirty-one Ist-year clinical anesthesia residents It,ere randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group handled 10 anesthetic emergencies using the screen-based anesthesia simulator program and received written feedback on their management, whereas the traditional (control) group was asked to study a handout covering the same 10 emergencies. All residents then were evaluated on their management of 4 standardized scenarios in a mannequin-based simulator using a quantitative scoring system. Results: The average point score for the simulator-with-debriefing group was 52.6 +/- 9.9 out of 95 possible points. The traditional group average point score was 43.4 +/- 5.9, p = .004. Conclusions: Residents who managed anesthetic problems using a screen-based anesthesia simulator handled the emergencies in a mannequin-based anesthesia simulator better than residents who were asked to study a handout covering the same problems. Computer simulations with feedback are effective as a supplement to traditional residency training methods for the management of medical emergencies. Copyright (C) 2001 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 96
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Responses to simulated anaesthetic emergencies by anaesthetists with different durations of clinical experience [J].
Byrne, AJ ;
Jones, JG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 78 (05) :553-556
[2]   COMPUTER-BASED INSTRUCTION AND HEALTH-PROFESSIONS EDUCATION - A METAANALYSIS OF OUTCOMES [J].
COHEN, PA ;
DACANAY, LS .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1992, 15 (03) :259-281
[3]  
DEANDA A, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V72, P308
[4]  
EWY GA, 1987, J MED EDUC, V62, P738
[5]   Assessment of clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral ratings [J].
Gaba, DM ;
Howard, SK ;
Flanagan, B ;
Smith, BE ;
Fish, KJ ;
Botney, R .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (01) :8-18
[6]  
Schwid H A, 1993, Anesthesiol Rev, V20, P185
[7]   Use of a computerized advanced cardiac life support simulator improves retention of advanced cardiac life support guidelines better than a textbook review [J].
Schwid, HA ;
Rooke, GA ;
Ross, BK ;
Sivarajan, M .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (04) :821-824
[8]   ANESTHESIOLOGISTS MANAGEMENT OF SIMULATED CRITICAL INCIDENTS [J].
SCHWID, HA ;
ODONNELL, D .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (04) :495-501
[9]  
Tuggy M L, 1998, J Am Board Fam Pract, V11, P426