共 41 条
Future liver remnant growth after various portal vein embolization regimens: a quantitative comparison
被引:6
作者:
Biggemann, Lorenz
[1
]
Uhlig, Johannes
[1
]
Streit, Ulrike
[1
]
Sack, Henrik
[1
]
Guo, Xiao Chao
[2
]
Jung, Carlo
[3
]
Ahmed, Saheeb
[1
]
Lotz, Joachim
[1
]
Mueller-Wille, Rene
[1
]
Hosseini, Ali Seif Amir
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Med Ctr Goettingen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Robert Koch Str 40, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Beijing, Peking Univ Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Med Ctr Gottingen, Dept Gastroenterol & Gastrointestinal Oncol, Gottingen, Germany
关键词:
Portal vein embolization;
future liver remnant;
ethylene vinyl alcohol;
HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA;
MAJOR HEPATECTOMY;
2-STAGE HEPATECTOMY;
HEPATIC RESECTION;
HYPERTROPHY;
LIGATION;
METASTASES;
SAFETY;
FEASIBILITY;
INDUCTION;
D O I:
10.1080/13645706.2019.1582067
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of right portal vein embolization using ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH-PVE) compared to other embolic agents and surgical right portal vein ligation (PVL). Material and methods: Patients with right sided liver malignancies scheduled for extensive surgery and receiving induction of liver hypertrophy via right portal vein embolization/ligature between 2010-2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Treatments included were ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx (R), EVOH-PVE), ethiodized oil (Lipiodol(R), Lipiodol/PVA-PVE), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA-PVE) or surgical ligature (PVL). Liver segments S2/3 were used to assess hypertrophy. Primary outcome was future liver remnant growth in ml/day. Results: Forty-one patients were included (EVOH-PVE n = 11; Lipiodol/PVA-PVE n = 10; PVA-PVE n = 8; PVL n = 12), the majority presenting with cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal metastases (n = 11; n = 27). Pre-interventional liver volumes were comparable (p = .095). Liver hypertrophy was successfully induced in all but one patient receiving Lipiodol/PVA-PVE. Liver segment S2/3 growth was largest for EVOH-PVE (5.38 ml/d) followed by PVA-PVE (2.5 ml/d), with significantly higher growth rates than PVL (1.24 ml/d; p < .001; p = .007). No significant difference was evident for Lipiodol/PVA-PVE (1.43 ml/d, p = .809). Conclusions: Portal vein embolization using EVOH demonstrates fastest S2/3 growth rates compared to other embolic agents and PVL, potentially due to its permanent portal vein embolization and induction of hepatic inflammation.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 106
页数:9
相关论文