Feature Selection For Machine Learning-Based Early Detection of Distributed Cyber Attacks

被引:19
作者
Feng, Yaokai [1 ]
Akiyama, Hitoshi [2 ]
Lu, Liang [2 ,4 ]
Sakurai, Kouichi [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Fac Adv Informat Technol, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Dept Informat, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Fac Informat, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
[4] Fujitsu Co Ltd, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
来源
2018 16TH IEEE INT CONF ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOM AND SECURE COMP, 16TH IEEE INT CONF ON PERVAS INTELLIGENCE AND COMP, 4TH IEEE INT CONF ON BIG DATA INTELLIGENCE AND COMP, 3RD IEEE CYBER SCI AND TECHNOL CONGRESS (DASC/PICOM/DATACOM/CYBERSCITECH) | 2018年
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
distributed cyber attacks; DDoS attacks; machine learning; feature selection; early detection; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/DASC/PiCom/DataCom/CyberSciTec.2018.00040
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
It is well known that distributed cyber attacks simultaneously launched from many hosts have caused the most serious problems in recent years including problems of privacy leakage and denial of services. Thus, how to detect those attacks at early stage has become an important and urgent topic in the cyber security community. For this purpose, recognizing C&C (Command & Control) communication between compromised bots and the C&C server becomes a crucially important issue, because C&C communication is in the preparation phase of distributed attacks. Although attack detection based on signature has been practically applied since long ago, it is well-known that it cannot efficiently deal with new kinds of attacks. In recent years, ML(Machine learning)-based detection methods have been studied widely. In those methods, feature selection is obviously very important to the detection performance. We once utilized up to 55 features to pick out C&C traffic in order to accomplish early detection of DDoS attacks. In this work, we try to answer the question that "Are all of those features really necessary?" We mainly investigate how the detection performance moves as the features are removed from those having lowest importance and we try to make it clear that what features should be payed attention for early detection of distributed attacks. We use honeypot data collected during the period from 2008 to 2013. SVM(Support Vector Machine) and PCA(Principal Component Analysis) are utilized for feature selection and SVM and RF(Random Forest) are for building the classifier. We find that the detection performance is generally getting better if more features are utilized. However, after the number of features has reached around 40, the detection performance will not change much even more features are used. It is also verified that, in some specific cases, more features do not always means a better detection performance. We also discuss 10 important features which have the biggest influence on classification.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 180
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]  
Mellish CS, 1995, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, V20-25, P1137
[22]   Anomaly Detection: A Survey [J].
Chandola, Varun ;
Banerjee, Arindam ;
Kumar, Vipin .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2009, 41 (03)
[23]  
Song F, 2010, P INT C SYST SCI ENG, DOI [10.1109/ICSEM.2010.14, DOI 10.1109/ICSEM.2010.14]
[24]   Feature selection using Decision Tree and classification through Proximal Support Vector Machine for fault diagnostics of roller bearing [J].
Sugumaran, V. ;
Muralidharan, V. ;
Ramachandran, K. I. .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2007, 21 (02) :930-942
[25]  
Takata O., 2016, MWS DAT 2016 ANT ENG
[26]  
Tang Y, 2005, IEEE INFOCOM SER, P1384
[27]   A Network Activity Classification Schema and Its Application to Scan Detection [J].
Treurniet, Joanne .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2011, 19 (05) :1396-1404
[28]  
Vinod Yegneswaran, 2003, Performance Evaluation Review, V31, P138, DOI 10.1145/885651.781045
[29]  
Weston J., FEATURE SELECTION SV
[30]   Low-Rate DDoS Attacks Detection and Traceback by Using New Information Metrics [J].
Xiang, Yang ;
Li, Ke ;
Zhou, Wanlei .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY, 2011, 6 (02) :426-437