A Proof-of-Concept Study of an In-Situ Partial-Ring Time-of-Flight PET Scanner for Proton Beam Verification

被引:1
作者
Krishnamoorthy, Srilalan [1 ]
Teo, Boon-Keng K. [2 ]
Zou, Wei [2 ]
McDonough, James [2 ]
Karp, Joel S. [1 ,3 ]
Surti, Suleman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Phys & Astron, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
In-room; in-situ; lanthanum bromide; partialring scanner; positron emission tomography (PET); proton range monitoring; proton therapy; time of flight (TOF); POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RANGE VERIFICATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; CLINICAL-USE; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE; DELIVERY; DETECTOR; BREAST;
D O I
10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3044326
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Development of a positron emission tomography (PET) system capable of in-situ imaging requires a design that can accommodate the proton treatment beam nozzle. Among the several PET instrumentation approaches developed thus far, the dual-panel PET scanner is often used as it is simpler to develop and integrate within the proton therapy gantry. Partial-angle coverage of these systems can however lead to limited-angle artifacts in the reconstructed PET image. We have previously demonstrated via simulations that time-of-flight (TOF) reconstruction reduces the artifacts accompanying limited-angle data, and permits proton range measurement with 1-2 mm accuracy and precision. In this work, we show measured results from a small proof-of-concept dual-panel PET system that uses TOF information to reconstruct PET data acquired after proton irradiation. The PET scanner comprises of two detector modules, each composed of an array of 4x4x30 mm(3) lanthanum bromide scintillator. Measurements are performed with an oxygen-rich gel-water, an adipose tissue equivalent material, and in vitro tissue phantoms. For each phantom measurement, a 2-Gy dose was deposited using 54-100 MeV proton beams. For each phantom, a Monte Carlo simulation generating the expected distribution of PET isotope from the corresponding proton irradiation was also performed. The proton range was calculated by drawing multiple depth profiles over a central region encompassing the proton dose deposition. For each profile, the proton range was calculated using two techniques 1) 50% pick-off from the distal edge of the profile and 2) comparing the measured and Monte Carlo profile to minimize the absolute sum of differences over the entire profile. A 10-min PET acquisition acquired with minimal delay post proton irradiation is compared with a 10-min PET scan acquired after a 20-min delay. Measurements show that PET acquisition with minimal delay is necessary to collect O-15 signal, and maximize C-11 signal collection with a short PET acquisition. In comparison with the 50% pick-off technique, the shift technique is more robust and offers better precision in measuring the proton range for the different phantoms. Range measurements from PET images acquired with minimal delay, and the shift technique demonstrates the ability to achieve <1.5 mm accuracy and precision in estimating proton range.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 702
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   A COMPARISON OF WATER EQUIVALENT THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS - CT METHOD VS HEAVY-ION BEAM TECHNIQUE [J].
ALPEN, EL ;
SAUNDERS, W ;
CHATTERJEE, A ;
LLACER, J ;
CHEN, GTY ;
SCHERER, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1985, 58 (690) :543-548
[2]   Preliminary results of an in-beam PET prototype for proton therapy [J].
Attanasi, F. ;
Belcari, N. ;
Camarda, M. ;
Cirrone, G. A. P. ;
Cuttone, G. ;
Del Guerra, A. ;
Di Rosa, F. ;
Lanconelli, N. ;
Rosso, V. ;
Russo, G. ;
Veechio, S. .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2008, 591 (01) :296-299
[3]   Characterization of an In-Beam PET Prototype for Proton Therapy With Different Target Compositions [J].
Attanasi, Francesca ;
Belcari, Nicola ;
Moehrs, Sascha ;
Rosso, Valeria ;
Vecchio, Sara ;
Cirrone, G. A. Pablo ;
Cuttone, Giacomo ;
Lojacono, Piero ;
Romano, Francesco ;
Lanconelli, Nico ;
Del Guerra, Alberto .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2010, 57 (03) :1563-1569
[4]   The effects of mapping CT images to Monte Carlo materials on GEANT4 proton simulation accuracy [J].
Barnes, Samuel ;
McAuley, Grant ;
Slater, James ;
Wroe, Andrew .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (04)
[5]   An experimental approach to improve the Monte Carlo modelling of offline PET/CT-imaging of positron emitters induced by scanned proton beams [J].
Bauer, J. ;
Unholtz, D. ;
Kurz, C. ;
Parodi, K. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (15) :5193-5213
[6]   Simulation of proton therapy treatment verification via PET imaging of induced positron-emitters [J].
Beebe-Wang, J ;
Vaska, P ;
Dilmanian, FA ;
Peggs, SG ;
Schlyer, DJ .
2003 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM, CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2004, :2496-2500
[7]   Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for patients with oropharynx cancer - A case matched analysis [J].
Blanchard, Pierre ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Gunn, G. Brandon ;
Rosenthal, David I. ;
Morrison, William H. ;
Hernandez, Mike ;
Crutison, Joseph ;
Lee, Jack J. ;
Ye, Rong ;
Fuller, C. David ;
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R. ;
Hutcheson, Kate A. ;
Holliday, Emma B. ;
Thaker, Nikhil G. ;
Sturgis, Erich M. ;
Kies, Merrill S. ;
Zhu, X. Ronald ;
Mohan, Radhe ;
Frank, Steven J. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (01) :48-55
[8]   New Digital Plug and Imaging Sensor for a Proton Therapy Monitoring System Based on Positron Emission Tomography [J].
D'Ascenzo, Nicola ;
Gao, Min ;
Antonecchia, Emanuele ;
Gnudi, Paolo ;
Chen, Hsien-Hsin ;
Chen, Fang-Hsin ;
Hong, Ji-Hong ;
Hsiao, Ing-Tsung ;
Yen, Tzu-Chen ;
Wang, Weidong ;
Xi, Daoming ;
Zhang, Bo ;
Xie, Qingguo .
SENSORS, 2018, 18 (09)
[9]   The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner [J].
Daube-Witherspoon, M. E. ;
Surti, S. ;
Perkins, A. ;
Kyba, C. C. M. ;
Wiener, R. ;
Werner, M. E. ;
Kulp, R. ;
Karp, J. S. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (01) :45-64
[10]   Target volume dose considerations in proton beam treatment planning for lung tumors [J].
Engelsman, M ;
Kooy, HM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (12) :3549-3557